Denied Give O-1/A-1 and OSA/ECA ability to arrest people

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Glazzing

Glazzing

Active member
One Year Club Conversation Starter Community Engager
May 31, 2023
452
1
102
21
17
Des Moines, Iowa
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Let's them arrest people

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
idk

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Don't have to wait on noob IA
Able to arrest people when no IA on are onsite

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
none

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Should be accepted the change to remove it was bad
 
Upvote 7 Downvote
Zen

Zen

Active member
Community Engager Conversation Starter
Sep 16, 2023
508
153
21
appo said:
this seems like an ironic statement as the change has stripped away isd's & assistant's very own rp experience
(and their job to enforce the legal codex, it is their jobs as assistants & internal security).



ic issue

+ support
Click to expand...
At a recent meeting, idr whether it was SC or SL or both, somebody basically gave the blanket statement that enforcing FLC is outright not part of either role's job and that it was basically powercreep that they got those powers in the first place. ISD and assistants are there to protect SC and carry out their orders, that is their purpose, not enforcing FLC - that is IA's job.
 
Kayla

Kayla

Head Moderator
Head Moderator
SCP-RP Staff
Resources Team
Conversation Starter
Oct 20, 2023
118
36
21
big +support
- When IA aren't online, there is no one to make arrests - forcing people to deal with others causing issues.
- Half the time, IA don't even respond, meaning we have to call on ISD assistance, but not being able to arrest makes it pointless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gizzmo and appo
Nomad_600

Nomad_600

Civil Gamers Expert
Donator
One Year Club Two Year Club Conversation Starter
Jan 4, 2022
236
25
71
appo said:
this seems like an ironic statement as the change has stripped away isd's & assistant's very own rp experience
(and their job to enforce the legal codex, it is their jobs as assistants & internal security).



ic issue

+ support
Click to expand...
Brother, no.

To give more elaboration, A-1 and O-1 ( I refuse to call them ISD ), assistant primary job is to ASSIST/OBEY and carry out site command order, no where does it state that you guys enforce the actual code. That was simply a job you guys appointed yourself.
 
  • reaction_title.7
  • Like
Reactions: Zen and appo
Mars

Mars

Active member
Conversation Starter
Oct 7, 2023
287
68
21
Nomad_600 said:
Brother, no.

To give more elaboration, A-1 and O-1 ( I refuse to call them ISD ), assistant primary job is to ASSIST/OBEY and carry out site command order, no where does it state that you guys enforce the actual code. That was simply a job you guys appointed yourself.
Click to expand...

Nomad_600 said:
-Support

Hell no, why is it that the branch of enforcing the codex is being overstepped by ISD. ISD primary responsibility if we were to bring it down to the most simple of term is to protect Site Command and carry out SC order, if SC need someone to be dealt with then that should be done using covert operation where the person are just kidnap and bring to the SC rather than them going around LARPing as the police of the site. If you really need to arrest someone then hear me out, GET THE BRANCH THAT IS PRIMARILY RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT, your solution to a shit IA can't be just to cast it aside, your solution to a shit IA is to work WITH IA leadership to fix it. Let the branch responsible for arrest deal with arrest. ISD and Assistant already power-trip more than an officer in the rural county in Los Angeles.
Click to expand...
Nomad_600 said:
Brother, no.

To give more elaboration, A-1 and O-1 ( I refuse to call them ISD ), assistant primary job is to ASSIST/OBEY and carry out site command order, no where does it state that you guys enforce the actual code. That was simply a job you guys appointed yourself.
Click to expand...
you must hate ISD 😭
 
  • Like
Reactions: appo
Gizzmo

Gizzmo

Active member
One Year Club Conversation Starter
Oct 23, 2022
216
29
21
Niox said:
bro is giving counterpoints and arguments to something he disagrees with. how do that equal hating the regiment

also i think all of ISD hate me specifically since i dont like this change
Click to expand...
The issue is his history with ISD, along with making up scenarios or blatantly lying. Calling "A-1 and O-1 the primary policing regiment" is insane, if we look at the logs on the US I'm certain we wouldn't even make up 10% of the arrests over the past month, and of those I'd say 50% are SC ordered arrests, and 25% helping out IA when they ask. He also shares the ideology of "You should only be guarding SC and nothing else" which killed ISD activity awhile ago, and he knows it did cause we had a meeting between NL/SL/A1/O5 to address the issue.

Also I hate you cause your G.O.I, not cuz of your opinion :). /s
 
Last edited:
Niox

Niox

Active member
One Year Club Community Engager Conversation Starter
Jan 23, 2023
2,234
406
21
Gizzmo said:
The issue is his history with ISD, along with making up scenarios or blatantly lying.
Click to expand...
if you could send any proof of this to me i would be happy to hear you out on this

Gizzmo said:
if we look at the logs on the US I'm certain we wouldn't even make up 10% of the arrests over the past month, and of those I'd say 50% are SC ordered arrests, and 25% helping out IA when they ask.
Click to expand...
if you do such a small amount of arrests, whats the issue with not being able to do any? Surely it isnt that big a change if its only 10%?

Gizzmo said:
Also I hate you cause your G.O.I, not cuz of your opinion :). /s
Click to expand...
what the freak bro, how could you do this to me
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom