Denied Give O-1/A-1 and OSA/ECA ability to arrest people

[Glazzing]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Let's them arrest people

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
idk

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Don't have to wait on noob IA
Able to arrest people when no IA on are onsite

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
none

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Should be accepted the change to remove it was bad

 

[Zen]

this seems like an ironic statement as the change has stripped away isd's & assistant's very own rp experience
(and their job to enforce the legal codex, it is their jobs as assistants & internal security).



ic issue

+ support

At a recent meeting, idr whether it was SC or SL or both, somebody basically gave the blanket statement that enforcing FLC is outright not part of either role's job and that it was basically powercreep that they got those powers in the first place. ISD and assistants are there to protect SC and carry out their orders, that is their purpose, not enforcing FLC - that is IA's job.

 

[Ogre]

-support
we can just contact an IA if needed

 

["Sigma"]

-support
Is quite a good reasoning but that literally just makes IA "extra" like it just makes them not really have any need to do anything

 

[Bohemia]

+ Support
The UK issue in question

 

[Gizzmo]

+support
Majority of the issues people listed wouldn’t be a thing if you just talked to RP leaders instead of complaining to sl

 

[Kayla]

big +support
- When IA aren't online, there is no one to make arrests - forcing people to deal with others causing issues.
- Half the time, IA don't even respond, meaning we have to call on ISD assistance, but not being able to arrest makes it pointless.

 

[Dennid]

massive +support

 

[Nomad_600]

this seems like an ironic statement as the change has stripped away isd's & assistant's very own rp experience
(and their job to enforce the legal codex, it is their jobs as assistants & internal security).



ic issue

+ support

Brother, no.

To give more elaboration, A-1 and O-1 ( I refuse to call them ISD ), assistant primary job is to ASSIST/OBEY and carry out site command order, no where does it state that you guys enforce the actual code. That was simply a job you guys appointed yourself.

 

[Mars]

Brother, no.

To give more elaboration, A-1 and O-1 ( I refuse to call them ISD ), assistant primary job is to ASSIST/OBEY and carry out site command order, no where does it state that you guys enforce the actual code. That was simply a job you guys appointed yourself.

-Support

Hell no, why is it that the branch of enforcing the codex is being overstepped by ISD. ISD primary responsibility if we were to bring it down to the most simple of term is to protect Site Command and carry out SC order, if SC need someone to be dealt with then that should be done using covert operation where the person are just kidnap and bring to the SC rather than them going around LARPing as the police of the site. If you really need to arrest someone then hear me out, GET THE BRANCH THAT IS PRIMARILY RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT, your solution to a shit IA can't be just to cast it aside, your solution to a shit IA is to work WITH IA leadership to fix it. Let the branch responsible for arrest deal with arrest. ISD and Assistant already power-trip more than an officer in the rural county in Los Angeles.

Brother, no.

To give more elaboration, A-1 and O-1 ( I refuse to call them ISD ), assistant primary job is to ASSIST/OBEY and carry out site command order, no where does it state that you guys enforce the actual code. That was simply a job you guys appointed yourself.

you must hate ISD

 

[Gizzmo]

you must hate ISD

Targeted ISD when he was staff aswell n got told off for it by hound

 

[Glazzing]

Brother, no.

To give more elaboration, A-1 and O-1 ( I refuse to call them ISD ), assistant primary job is to ASSIST/OBEY and carry out site command order, no where does it state that you guys enforce the actual code. That was simply a job you guys appointed yourself.

ISD's biggest opp

 

[Nomad_600]

you must hate ISD

Never hated the regiment, I hated that the regiment slowly taking over the responsibility of other department

Targeted ISD when he was staff aswell n got told off for it by hound

that's just false :/

 

[Niox]

you must hate ISD

bro is giving counterpoints and arguments to something he disagrees with. how do that equal hating the regiment

also i think all of ISD hate me specifically since i dont like this change

 

[Gizzmo]

bro is giving counterpoints and arguments to something he disagrees with. how do that equal hating the regiment

also i think all of ISD hate me specifically since i dont like this change

The issue is his history with ISD, along with making up scenarios or blatantly lying. Calling "A-1 and O-1 the primary policing regiment" is insane, if we look at the logs on the US I'm certain we wouldn't even make up 10% of the arrests over the past month, and of those I'd say 50% are SC ordered arrests, and 25% helping out IA when they ask. He also shares the ideology of "You should only be guarding SC and nothing else" which killed ISD activity awhile ago, and he knows it did cause we had a meeting between NL/SL/A1/O5 to address the issue.

Also I hate you cause your G.O.I, not cuz of your opinion . /s

 

[Grong]

-Support

Not only is it not part of their duties but no one ever does it.

I could maybe see assistants though but still there's usually someone on IA to do it anyway and it takes like a minute to call them over.

 

[Niox]

The issue is his history with ISD, along with making up scenarios or blatantly lying.

if you could send any proof of this to me i would be happy to hear you out on this

if we look at the logs on the US I'm certain we wouldn't even make up 10% of the arrests over the past month, and of those I'd say 50% are SC ordered arrests, and 25% helping out IA when they ask.

if you do such a small amount of arrests, whats the issue with not being able to do any? Surely it isnt that big a change if its only 10%?

Also I hate you cause your G.O.I, not cuz of your opinion . /s

what the freak bro, how could you do this to me

 

[Wonka Kane]

+support

Internal Security should have the ability to arrest people. It worked just fine in the past.

 

[Grong]

Internal Security should have the ability to arrest people. It worked just fine in the past.

How many times out of 10 did we actually do it though?

 

[Wonka Kane]

How many times out of 10 did we actually do it though?

Like twice a week at best when OIG was doing something Which is another reason why it doesn't take away too much RP from IA as ISD barely used it, but it was very convenient for us to have the ability to arrest someone when no IA were around to they just took too long to respond.

 

[Grong]

Like twice a week at best when OIG was doing something Which is another reason why it doesn't take away too much RP from IA as ISD barely used it, but it was very convenient for us to have the ability to arrest someone when no IA were around to they just took too long to respond.

This may be valid