Denied IA Request for Access to E11, Nu-7 and DEA Communications

[John Dear]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion gives The Department Of internal Affairs access to E-11, Nu-7,and DEA Comms (/e11 /nu7 /dea)

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Improved Oversight: It allows us to closely monitor activities, ensuring that they operate within the parameters of our established protocols and guidelines.

Effective Investigations: Access to these communications greatly enhances our investigative capacity, allowing us to gather critical information and evidence.

Additionally,we already have access to communications within the GSD, Medical, and Research departments. Extending this access to E11, Nu-7 and DEA communications would maintain consistency and promote fairness and transparency in our internal investigations across the Foundation.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
They have less privacy

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
This request should be approved since it would significantly benefit IA. I already went IC with this request to the O5 council of Site65 and they approved the request.

 

[Khan]

I'd also like to say IA are mistreated on USA and people see Ethics as a joke which is not good.

i think you should take a page out of this guys book! not leaving a verdict on a post while you comment is against the rules and as a SL member, i do not think you should be bending the rules for yourself!

-support btw

 

[Mc Rib]

View attachment 9944
i think you should take a page out of this guys book! not leaving a verdict on a post while you comment is against the rules and as a SL member, i do not think you should be bending the rules for yourself!

-support btw

Damn also -support

 

[Aura_]

-support.

It'd be infobreach galore. These elements handle themselves pretty well already.
IA is already an unfavorable role to take on; hands are full with GSD, Research AND medical.


Those are the areas where the MOST violations occur (as they deal with newer players/D-class). IA already lets a lot of violations escape their eyes when it comes to just these 3 elements. Having IA have to monitor DEA and MTF as well would just increase the amount of times a violation happens in those areas, decreasing the overall quality of those 3 new-player oriented elements.

Rethink this one with that in mind. Perhaps a more senior IA role would be more ideal for specifically that, but not IA as a whole.

 

["Wolf"]

+Support
Only for Ambassadors tho

 

[Rushi]

Suggestion Denied

---

Hi @John Dear,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.

The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion because this would not work well (because of info breaches and e.t.c) and the current comms are fine as it is.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​