Accepted Key card storage "pothead"

[Swompgobblin]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
[This adds storage for hostile GOI's keycards.]

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
[Ive looked and havent seen anything.]

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
This would give key cards more value meaning that hostile GOIs would want to get to the area storing them. I think that key cards are very expensive and very useful so to limit them storage should be capped 5-10 cards whatever seems fit aswell has having a limit of 2 of each card aswell as only one cl4. and I believe CL5 cards should not be allowed to be put in because they can easily abused. It gets rid of the keycard piles aswell

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
[People could stack cards but that can already be limited. I personally believe there is no downside to this suggestion but I'm open to suggestions on how it could be bad]

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
[I think hostile GOI keycards are very inexpensive. they should mean more as they need to be earned. this would also give more meaning to raids]

 

[Skittles]

-Support

Adding an artificial limit on the amount of keycards you can store isn't something I'd like to see, and especially against a ban of keeping enemy CL5 cards. "They could be abused" how? The whole point of having the enemy's keycards is to use it against them.

However, a storage thing like how documents can be stored is something I'd like to see. Saves keycards being wiped when the anti lag script is used and would save on lag.

 

[Emilia Foddg]

Having a persistent storage for other GOI's keycards is a planned feature.

 

[Swompgobblin]

-Support

Adding an artificial limit on the amount of keycards you can store isn't something I'd like to see, and especially against a ban of keeping enemy CL5 cards. "They could be abused" how? The whole point of having the enemy's keycards is to use it against them.

fair there should atleast me a cap so no lag. but cl5 should be allowed now that i look at it. that dos sound dumb to not include

 

[Kevin Ki]

-support
Naw

 

[Dinklesprinkle]

Accepted - Storage Cache's

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion would add a storage cache for Foundation, UNGOC and CI. this would be a sizable container (or several (1 per item type)) for people to store their Looted weapons & keycards in a dedotated container instead of slapping them down...

www.civilgamers.com

cough

 

[Swompgobblin]

Accepted - Storage Cache's

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion would add a storage cache for Foundation, UNGOC and CI. this would be a sizable container (or several (1 per item type)) for people to store their Looted weapons & keycards in a dedotated container instead of slapping them down...

www.civilgamers.com

cough

Did not look that up i looked up keycard storage welp

 

[Niox]

accepted before so real no cap ong
+Support

 

[Auburn]

Suggestion Approved​

---

Hi Swompgobblin,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as accepted.​