Head Moderator
MilitaryRP Staff
Platform Team
DonatorWhat does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Lower the requirement for ERT to deploy (Either SCP kills threshold and/or breach time)
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Allow ERT to be called on time if no SSL is online to force call them
Allow breaches to be cleared up faster so PassiveRP can occur more
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
May discourage people from wanting to breach due to the fact that if they do well, they get punished by ERT
May discourage CI from doing a HCZ raid and breach SCP's if ERT arrives faster.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Currently, ERT MOST of the times gets deployed far too late. Either during a 008 breach where they already infected the entire site and are nearing surface or are already on surface. This suggestion isn't comming from a one time occurance, but from alot of occasions. This would provide a bigger oppertunity for breaches to get contained faster, so PassiveRP can continue.
Lower the requirement for ERT to deploy (Either SCP kills threshold and/or breach time)
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Allow ERT to be called on time if no SSL is online to force call them
Allow breaches to be cleared up faster so PassiveRP can occur more
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
May discourage people from wanting to breach due to the fact that if they do well, they get punished by ERT
May discourage CI from doing a HCZ raid and breach SCP's if ERT arrives faster.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Currently, ERT MOST of the times gets deployed far too late. Either during a 008 breach where they already infected the entire site and are nearing surface or are already on surface. This suggestion isn't comming from a one time occurance, but from alot of occasions. This would provide a bigger oppertunity for breaches to get contained faster, so PassiveRP can continue.
