Denied Make it FailRP to....

['Blue']

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Make it FailRP when theres a undercover guy "CI/D-CLASS" and they found out hes a intruder Make it FailRP when they do Electro shoc
therepy to reveal who he is, because it dose not make sence in role play.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):​

1. It would make more sence​
2. It would make RP better​

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
None

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Because it dose not make sence in RP when you do EST to remove there disguse​

 

[SamPaval]

-/+ on this

Legit impossible to uncover a DC if they have card and is the right outfit as knat dont go low on I'd cards

 

[Skittles]

-Support

This would imo just ruin rp, as the only way to deal with the intruder then without getting rid of his disguise would be to kill them. CI DC's tend to get rid of each others CI keycard before a DC too, so that form of identification is gone.

 

['Blue']

-Support

This would imo just ruin rp, as the only way to deal with the intruder then without getting rid of his disguise would be to kill them. CI DC's tend to get rid of each others CI keycard before a DC too, so that form of identification is gone.

But that dose not make sence, they should just make a new way to get rid of disguse

 

[Drew]

-SUPPORT
i don't see why it doesn't make sence since it's just a way to reveal who he is or who he works for

 

[SamPaval]

But that dose not make sence, they should just make a new way to get rid of disguse

why make a whole new way which takes time and has to be rushed
when the old way is completely fine

 

[Claire!]

+Support.
While this would be a buff to CI/D-Class let me explain.

Its not impossibile to find them out then, it will require more steps to do it. Example: You have a Site Advisor, His kants are weird, but his ID Matches, Instead of doing EST You will bring him to a Bio door ( Any around the site) and just have him open it. Also makes more RP sense to do this.

However not a staff ruling, just make it a feature.

 

[MazuzaM]

+Support.
While this would be a buff to CI/D-Class let me explain.

Its not impossibile to find them out then, it will require more steps to do it. Example: You have a Site Advisor, His kants are weird, but his ID Matches, Instead of doing EST You will bring him to a Bio door ( Any around the site) and just have him open it. Also makes more RP sense to do this.

However not a staff ruling, just make it a feature.

EST description literally says that it's to remove anomalous effects and disguises

 

[Claire!]

EST description literally says that it's to remove anomalous effects and disguises

I mean like, it shouldn't though... I get where you are coming from, but agian, In a Realstic standpoint, it wouldn't remove disguises. I get 914 is Anomalous but that wouldn't really chnage your entire body due to the fact 914 changes the way your body stretches

 

[PhoenixHeanix]

-Support
No. EST right now is quite balanced, this does not need to be changed.

 

[MazuzaM]

I mean like, it shouldn't though... I get where you are coming from, but agian, In a Realstic standpoint, it wouldn't remove disguises. I get 914 is Anomalous but that wouldn't really chnage your entire body due to the fact 914 changes the way your body stretches

In real life you don't get killed to be revived so EST isn't realistic regardless

 

['Blue']

In real life you don't get killed to be revived so EST isn't realistic regardless

True

 

[Claire!]

In real life you don't get killed to be revived so EST isn't realistic regardless

Which is why I really want it to be changed, but its not a needed change at the moment that Content team will probbaly want.

 

['Blue']

How do i make it so that i dont get an email everytime someone replyes?

 

[Dr. Swanson]

because it dose not make sence in role play.

Id like you to elaborate on this before I state any of my opinions

 

[Bubba]

-Support

This would imo just ruin rp, as the only way to deal with the intruder then without getting rid of his disguise would be to kill them. CI DC's tend to get rid of each others CI keycard before a DC too, so that form of identification is gone.

This isn't an intended way to reveal someone in a disguise. How would this ruin RP? There are many ways to try and reveal someone. The main one being interrogations.

Keep in mind, on MRP there is no defibs, or harpoons, or anything for electroshock, we use only RP and interrogations.

In a staff perspective, I would say this would fall under Failrp, what RP is being done when someone performs electroshock therapy to reveal a disguise? It just seems like a lazy way to get it done rather than RP'ing it out.

 

[Bubba]

How do i make it so that i dont get an email everytime someone replyes?

Untick the "watch" button at the top of the post

 

[Darren]

This isn't an intended way to reveal someone in a disguise. How would this ruin RP? There are many ways to try and reveal someone. The main one being interrogations.

Keep in mind, on MRP there is no defibs, or harpoons, or anything for electroshock, we use only RP and interrogations.

In a staff perspective, I would say this would fall under Failrp, what RP is being done when someone performs electroshock therapy to reveal a disguise? It just seems like a lazy way to get it done rather than RP'ing it out.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[Dinklesprinkle]

-/+ Support

I agree that Using EST to Remove a disguise is kind of weird and unrealistic but making it a FailRP rule is not going to work as doing anything that is not your direct job's parameters will cause you to get a FailRP warn and demotivates people to actually RP. i feel a better suggestion would be to have it removed as a "feature" and for a replacement suggestion to be in place as Content & Devs need more then just "this is weird please change it"

 

[Reiner Zufall]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Make it FailRP when theres a undercover guy "CI/D-CLASS" and they found out hes a intruder Make it FailRP when they do Electro shoc
therepy to reveal who he is, because it dose not make sence in role play.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):​

1. It would make more sence​
2. It would make RP better​

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
None

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Because it dose not make sence in RP when you do EST to remove there disguse​

-support

It is a essential part of RP, also CI and GOC do the same otherwise how do you want to prove identities ? Medical department would suffer a lot from this. People would abuse 914 on 1:1 to get a different disguise and troll around without getting caught ,believe it or not ISD has to deal with this too many times.