Content Suggestion mega CI Overhall

[pricetag]

THIS IS US CI​

What does this suggestion change/add/remove
Give CI T-90 (which is already in the CI vehicle group so idk why its not in the game.) my number 1 pick btw
Ability to get warfunds from destroying Enemy vehicles ( we have 0 ways to get warfunds while F and GOC has infinite) second pick
Buff M202 (Idk why this WARFUND gl got nerfed because its actually useless now, we tell everyone NOT to buy these)
better weapons for our classes (our best weapons are permaweapons)
More TB slots or better abilities (Our TB is purely support and gets mogged by every other TB in the game)
Buff BTR-90 (Give it AP ammo because ts is so ass, its too big ,slow, and low damage)
Buff BTR-82 ( every other vec. has bugged hitboxes (on the front atleast i have proof of the boxer at min) and the engine hitbox is bigger then my mom)
Give us some AT mines ( This would be fire WF item which is what we need not the dogshit that we get like 4 different supply crates of the same thing)
Buff Bomb drones ( does 0 dmg to vecs.)
more player slots on jobs (wdym out of 140 player regiment we only have 1 jug)
Give us TIGER M ASG-30 (this is GL vec. it would help all the infantry that GOC and F have during hostile interaction)
New CI job "Mechanic" spawns in garage with only item being gun and a repair torch maybe a better version

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?
probably, mine is different because its actually needed

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
CI isn't outclassed by miles by the other 2 factions.
CI activity doesn't drop because we get shit on, on surface
All of CI can actually help instead of maybe 6 people max


Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
GOC and Foundation might hate on us because we are slightly under them instead of it being an insane outclass

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
why shouldn't this get accepted is the real question, now IK the content might say this is very bad suggestion BUT they don't actually play the game and just test it on stationary moments in GM plain. you have to factor in we have no infantry because he have 0 matadors/at4 24/7 because the people get sniped from 100 meters away or suits.
WE of CI Command arent looking for everything here but atleast a couple to help balance out.

 

[Nickel]

u have never touched surface got it.

Just not true, I am in both GOC and CI (mainly GOC from these two, but when bored play CI too.). I also have a Senior Agent and Field Agent WL for DEA, so I know a bit about every side.

"2:1 war" this alone shows me that you are a genius who knows exactly what they are talking about

With 2:1 war I am talking about 2 Faction against 1, in this case F and GOC against CI, obviously this isn't fair. Even if (from what I heard) it isn't an official war between F and CI, I saw enough combat between the two factions today on US and you are well, openly hostile.

I would like anyone that disagrees with this to play CI during this goc war because i can guarantee maybe 3-4 days in your gonna come back and upvote this suggestion.

Unfortuntately rules say no for me, so I can't talk about that claim. (Cannot be in regiments or have whitelists on both servers)

LTN vs HTG

I have no idea what LTN vs HTG is, but probaly some strong side against a weaker one I suppose.

we were NEVER outmanned the entire day today btw (yes i mean sop+goc)

From the amount of players I have seen on surface, maybe not 2 to 1 but there were more SOP and GOC than CI.


If something like this would only affect the US CI, I wouldn't say anything as I am a UK main, but considering it would affect both US and UK I am very much against buffing CI by a lot.

 

[pricetag]

idk i think your ignorance is showing here, site admin + ecm are very hands on ooc roles that are supposed to know about the climate of all aspects of the server, literally their responsibility to make sure that both the RP and Combat are conducive to the current server culture so icl your response is just copium.

ig my response is copium u caught me dawg. but when uk sop have skill issue they get help when us ci have "skill issue" we get the opposite!
idk what else ima supposed to say to these guys in my comment section, theres a handful of people in CI who actually do stuff

 

[pricetag]

ive had manager,NU7 LT, CI bcom, goc cpl (ik my signature isnt updated but idc), and both AO. on foundation so DEA,Nu7,AO. when i would go on surface i would legit feel bad and flag on CI. on GOC when fighting CI i wouldnt i would immediately flag on CI cuz goc op, so IK what im saying here.

With 2:1 war I am talking about 2 Faction against 1, in this case F and GOC against CI, obviously this isn't fair. Even if (from what I heard) it isn't an official war between F and CI, I saw enough combat between the two factions today on US and you are well, openly hostile.

never seen u btw. also ik what u meant by 2:1 but clearly u dont know what i meant its fine. yes its GOC+F VS CI right now, those 2 never got the same numbers as us tho.

Unfortuntately rules say no for me, so I can't talk about that claim.

rules say no CI for idk what u mean by this

I have no idea what LTN vs HTG is, but probaly some strong side against a weaker one I suppose.

low tier normie vs high tier god. yes u are right

From the amount of players I have seen on surface, maybe not 2 to 1 but there were more SOP and GOC than CI.

someone do a buzzer sound cuz this is wrong atleast when i was actually on CI

 

[Nickel]

never seen u btw.

Obviously, I'm not flying on surface uncloaked..

rules say no CI for idk what u mean by this

Cant be in regiments on UK and US

Enough from me, wish you the best of luck with this suggestion (and no, I am not intentionally saying this is a sarcastic way..)

 

[Joe "Enoch"]

As someone who has been DEA, O1, A1, Nu-7, GOC, and CI. Out of all the roles, the people with the worst stuff have to be CI. Most of the guns feel really bad to use. When it comes to PvP, there are way more disguise cards on the other side (GOC has 9 cards, and DEA has 17 cards), which allows them to jump and take fights where they can shoot first, which leads to a win 9/10 times. When it comes to vehicle combat, the CI BTR-82 is weaker than the LAV and Boxer; the BTR-90 is weaker than the Marader and Puma, and the Nu-7 gets a tank that outclasses the BTR-90 as well. The only thing that CI gets over foundation is a TB, but when you have AO on the surface, fighting that TB is bound to end really quickly. Overall I can't think of a thing that CI has better than any other faction.

CI needs a buff or a thing that they are better or atleast compareable to the other factions. Maybe some SCPs that they can use or anonmolous equipment that will help them in fighting. Although thats just my two cents as someone who has played most combative roles on

 

[Callahan]

+Support
US CI in its current state during surface PvP is one of the most unenjoyable experiences. The Leopard is by far the best vehicle in the game being able to one shot every vehicle that it comes into contact with and SOP has better guns with 2 extra marksman's, a better jugg gun (Kac stoner > RPK), and more disguise cards. GOC have suits, the best guns in the game, and better vehicles than CI ON TOP of having Y-SUIT which is extremely overtuned.

The biggest argument for every change that happens to US CI is that it affects UK CI as well, but why? We should have them treated as different because they are on opposite servers with opposite needs. UK CI Do well because their best combatives play CI and from my experience UK SOP aren't the best combatives. US CI aren't the same they don't have the best combatives and therefore the imbalance between the other two factions are much clearer.

Arguing that it shouldn't be balanced because in lore they weren't balanced isn't a fair reason as it's a game with players who want to play the game and have fun, having it be unbalanced is not fun for the people who have to deal with being on the unbalanced side. I've played GOC, SOP, and CI. Surface PvP is by far harder for CI compared to the other factions.


tldr: CI has 0 clear advantages. Foundation and GOC DO. Buff US CI.

View attachment 29330
One Y-SUIT ^

UK CI succeeding while US CI aren’t sort of just proves that the ability for you to do well with your current tools is there but it’s just a matter of skill and strategy ig

 

[pricetag]

UK CI succeeding while US CI aren’t sort of just proves that the ability for you to do well with your current tools is there but it’s just a matter of skill and strategy ig

dawg theres 2 sides to this idk what else to say. TMT

 

[Rook]

idk i think your ignorance is showing here, site admin + ecm are very hands on ooc roles that are supposed to know about the climate of all aspects of the server, literally their responsibility to make sure that both the RP and Combat are conducive to the current server culture so icl your response is just copium.

I'm going to be honest, this just seems like a UK POV mostly because you guys run shit differently. Most of the UK is just larp on US its combative and ECMs & O5 are both only involved in RP they don't get into the aspect of combat. The only people that get involved with combat related things are combative regs/departments.

 

[BorisIsGood]

UK CI succeeding while US CI aren’t sort of just proves that the ability for you to do well with your current tools is there but it’s just a matter of skill and strategy ig

You are missing the point to our statements completely, the whole point is this is for US CI and proving the imbalance between the three factions.

I'm just going to say it, UK CI are better because UK CI are actually JUST BETTER than the foundation in all aspects at the game, not because their KIT is better their KIT is objectively WAY worse.

You are struggling to see where it is unbalanced because you play on the UK server where CI is dominant due to their vast skill difference which isn't as prevalent on US.

If this was the case of each side being better so it doesn't matter, why not just make it balanced so whoever wins is actually just who has the better players?

 

[pricetag]

Wait EVERYONE LETS RELAX, this is NOT a cope suggestion, we are WINNING the war, but losing the battle. genuinely only reason we are winning is cuz of the handful of people vs 2 regs this is legit call of duty ghost

 

[Joe "Enoch"]

UK CI succeeding while US CI aren’t sort of just proves that the ability for you to do well with your current tools is there but it’s just a matter of skill and strategy ig

Regarding points like this I will point out that content team decided to create the Nu-7 jug job because UK SOP were losing to UK CI alot, and at the same time on US. Their SOP was crushing US CI, I and many argued the same point that you are and it was disregarded. Also this is a suggestion to help improve the server why cant we ALL be civil?

 

[Rook]

UK CI succeeding while US CI aren’t sort of just proves that the ability for you to do well with your current tools is there but it’s just a matter of skill and strategy ig

I'm going to be honest I don't believe it's even strategy in this case. If anything, I believe in the UK server it's a skill diff, as I've fought UK players, and imo they aren't hard to fight, AO or not. The only good combatives in UK are CI members besides that, everyone is kind of bad.

 

[MaxoMaxoMaxo]

You are missing the point to our statements completely, the whole point is this is for US CI and proving the imbalance between the three factions.

I'm just going to say it, UK CI are better because UK CI are actually JUST BETTER than the foundation in all aspects at the game, not because their KIT is better their KIT is objectively WAY worse.

You are struggling to see where it is unbalanced because you play on the UK server where CI is dominant due to their vast skill difference which isn't as prevalent on US.

If this was the case of each side being better so it doesn't matter, why not just make it balanced so whoever wins is actually just who has the better players?

it isnt just for us ci is it though, content is shared on BOTH servers, meaning any changes done to the US server also affect the UK server. that is exactly why UK players are commenting on this, because it doesn't affect just you.

 

[Claire!]

-Support

Shit suggestion, just a US issue CI do not need a buff

 

['Mosasaur']

I've been playing this server for 5 years, I have held basically every surface leadership role on all sides and CI on surface has never been balanced with foundation which is a pretty big issue in my eyes. I like the idea of CI getting a tank and them having more ways to get warfunds because as of currently basically the only way to get warfunds is to raid SA and hack them but even then you just get stopped by 5 AO and a jug rushing in on NHU and you can't really counter it. Surface as a whole is just in a pretty bad state right now with GOC weapons being completely overpowered, foundation having basically unlimited numbers with AO, DEA, Nu-7, and whoever else, and then there is CI with very below average weapons, practically getting scammed every time they call in anything worth warfunds, and also have the natural de-buff of having most new players that come to the server. I also agree with some other points that honestly some of the time it is just a skill issue, CI don't have the greatest leaders at time and it's very hard to get quality leaders when its considered a starter regiment which also lowers combat ability as a whole.

There is no need to insult and create this suggestion an argument either Feel like all suggestions atp have just been grounds for people that don't agree with it just hate on it for no reason and give no valid thoughts on why its a bad suggestion and how there is a way to make it happen just differently.

 

[Claire!]

some random again with 0 contribution cant even classify u as a combative because i faintly remember u and u suck at every form of combat

what do you mean i'm not count as a combative, I do combat every day as GOC with missions

this is just a shit suggestion from US, rather than learning to get better your just making suggestions to get a buff, where CI do not need a buff because it is balanced quite well, if not a bit too overpowered, some might say.

 

[Claire!]

yo CI is overpowered guys wrap it up.
theres really a pattern here with the UK and US thing huh

so what im seeing is SOP on UK is braindead but SOP on US is good at combat, thats genuinely what im understanding.


Quick someone make a nerf CI suggestion!

I think you are also forgetting, CI isn't the main faction. At the end of the day, the servers will always be different in terms of combat, and on UK CI clears the water of US CI.

Some genuine feedback I'd give is this isn't needed, and you should have US CI train on being better at combat, as there is no issues with it on UK.

 

[pricetag]

I think you are also forgetting, CI isn't the main faction. At the end of the day, the servers will always be different in terms of combat, and on UK CI clears the water of US CI.

Some genuine feedback I'd give is this isn't needed, and you should have US CI train on being better at combat, as there is no issues with it on UK.

so we have selective reading. US CI is good but sop is too. UK CI is good but sop isnt.
"train CI on us" i wish it was this easy.
CI isnt the main faction but it still has player who want to have fun is what we are forgetting

 

[Starling6]

i dunno the current climate, but from what ive seen

CI is the most underpowered faction when it comes purely to surface warfare

give 'em something. maybe not everything here but atleast something

+ soup for a general buff

 

[pricetag]

Can any content team members realize something.
REAL combatives are agreeing with this post.
NONcombatives are not while also being UK not even US.
I’ll say again, UK has 0 sop, US has SOP