Denied [MRP] Peacetime Missions

[Kvalax]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:

- Removes armoured vehicles during Missions (for example: During a Machinery defence they can't use tanks to defend/attack the objective)

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):

- Gives the tank regiment no more advantage over every other regiment
- No more armoured vehicles in enemy territories (prevents confusion between the players & staff members)

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:

- Don't have any at the moment.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:

- During peacetime missions it isn't easy to compete against the tank regiments. If you have a Machinery defence, they will bring out a tank and destroy it in 10sec.
- I don't think there are any negative aspects to the suggestion.
- So people don't have to worry about an armoured vehicle in their territory.

 

[WotInkermnation]

-Support
get better

 

[Wolves]

No armoured vehicles in enemy territories during peacetime was already a rule unless your team controls the point where the objective is like if ET is controlled by NWO they can have a T90 defend the machine cause it's in their territory.
So you mean just keep all armoured vehicles away from peacetime missions is what you asking???

Plus its fun and great training how to deal with armoured vehicles
-support

 

[Valkon]

Neutral

I really dislike the 'no armoured vehicles in enemy territory' rule, it's a ridiculous rule that just restricts RP. In this instance, it does give one side an advantage, but not one that isn't fun to overcome.

Remove the rule, if a team is dumb/brave enough to drive a tank through enemy territory then it should be considered an act of war anyway, and should be fair game. They lose a tank, it's on them.

 

[Hamood]

+Support

The fact that the 2 -support come from tank regiment players says enough. Literally cannot stop a tank from doing a machinery defence mission in 10 seconds

 

[CORE.]

+Support

 

[Eisenhower]

-support
BTR-80s and other IFVs (which other regiments that are not 1stAL/JAC can spawn in) which is not be covered under this suggestion, are far more effective at destroying the machinery defence than tanks are. This suggestion only removes tank regiments ability to win Machinery Defence without actually affecting balance.

 

[Mr Duckie]

Hi kvalax,

The use of armoured vehicles in enemy territories isn't allowed still even during missions, also using one in your own territory risks it being destroyed and isn't restockable as it is an RP scenario.​