What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Basically gives the JAC/1stAL AC/SC Reg Gen jobs a proper loadout instead of the barebones one we currently got.
A proper loadout would include these:
Matador/(NWO Equivalent, idk , haven't checked) should be changed to an AT4 ASAP.
A Stinger.
A C4 to accompany or outright replace the proxy mine.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Makes the JAC/1stAL reg gen jobs more inline with the regiments they command over's AT jobs to actually make them useful.
The matador is a joke of a launcher, it's inactive for a lot of time after it's animation "finishes" (it basically has a silent animation which is why you can't fire it even if it looks ready), which makes it really confusing to know when you can actually fire it again, so it should be replaced with the AT4.
The proxy mine is pretty situational and a C4 would be way more useful.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
I see no negatives, the 1 person limit per reg gen job already balances this.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Gives tank Reg Gen Job more use and makes their kits more inline with the regiments they command instead of a watered down version.
Basically gives the JAC/1stAL AC/SC Reg Gen jobs a proper loadout instead of the barebones one we currently got.
A proper loadout would include these:
Matador/(NWO Equivalent, idk , haven't checked) should be changed to an AT4 ASAP.
A Stinger.
A C4 to accompany or outright replace the proxy mine.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Makes the JAC/1stAL reg gen jobs more inline with the regiments they command over's AT jobs to actually make them useful.
The matador is a joke of a launcher, it's inactive for a lot of time after it's animation "finishes" (it basically has a silent animation which is why you can't fire it even if it looks ready), which makes it really confusing to know when you can actually fire it again, so it should be replaced with the AT4.
The proxy mine is pretty situational and a C4 would be way more useful.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
I see no negatives, the 1 person limit per reg gen job already balances this.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Gives tank Reg Gen Job more use and makes their kits more inline with the regiments they command instead of a watered down version.
Upvote
3