What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Due to the mass-radius and the danger posed by proximity slams, they cannot be utilized indoors in NWO/NATO bases for reasons of safety and structural stability.
Possible positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:[/B]
Almost nothing, except for the NATO or NWO High Command complaining about it.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted: Overall, I believe this suggestion should be added due to the fact that a certain individual likes to position proxy slams in NATO locations, which could endanger people and the building's stability if it ever explodes, as well as disrupt people's spying missions.
Due to the mass-radius and the danger posed by proximity slams, they cannot be utilized indoors in NWO/NATO bases for reasons of safety and structural stability.
Possible positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- adds an Rule to indicate where slams cannot be set and where they can be placed.
- This prevents the NATO/NWO High Command from spamming proximity strikes in CC or important structures.
- People's safety and the structural integrity of structures are enhanced by RP as opposed to having dangerously explosive and power proximity slams lying around.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:[/B]
Almost nothing, except for the NATO or NWO High Command complaining about it.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted: Overall, I believe this suggestion should be added due to the fact that a certain individual likes to position proxy slams in NATO locations, which could endanger people and the building's stability if it ever explodes, as well as disrupt people's spying missions.
Upvote
0