What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Stock timers are reduced in proportion to how much wars were reduced
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Makes it so there are more stocks available each war
- Gives a side a better chance of fighting back in the next war.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Change was not done already in order to benefit infantry gameplay
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Using what Cloak wrote in #change-logs
Taking this into account, this means that there has been a reduction of 41-43 minutes overall between the end of each war.
So before: 146-158 minutes and after: 105-115 minutes.
This represents a percentage decrease between 27-28% before and after. (Yes I did the Maths ?)
For things to be 'fair', I propose that stocks be reduced accordingly by 25%. This is rounded down for nice numbers and should help with any potential issues with balance if this suggestion were to be accepted. Ultimately, this will give the losing side in one war a chance of winning in the next war by giving them more stocks to use.
Stock timers are reduced in proportion to how much wars were reduced
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Makes it so there are more stocks available each war
- Gives a side a better chance of fighting back in the next war.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Change was not done already in order to benefit infantry gameplay
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Using what Cloak wrote in #change-logs
Peacetime was lowered by 30 minutes, pre-war was reduced by 5 minutes and war timer has been reduced anywhere between 6-8 minutes.
Taking this into account, this means that there has been a reduction of 41-43 minutes overall between the end of each war.
So before: 146-158 minutes and after: 105-115 minutes.
This represents a percentage decrease between 27-28% before and after. (Yes I did the Maths ?)
For things to be 'fair', I propose that stocks be reduced accordingly by 25%. This is rounded down for nice numbers and should help with any potential issues with balance if this suggestion were to be accepted. Ultimately, this will give the losing side in one war a chance of winning in the next war by giving them more stocks to use.
Upvote
6
Super Administrator
MilitaryRP Staff
Group Moderator
Donator
