What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
We replace the Chieftain with the old MARS15
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
The MARS15 used to be one of 17thAR most used tanks. It was the equivalent of the TAM. Im not sure when but it got removed.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Unique tactics not much health which makes it vulnerable. Relatively Slow (which is a plus for the enemy) but low in height (plus for NATO tacticts)
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Depends on who you ask. the tank is small and lower in height which could make it either headglitch if there are any areas or if someone goes and rams the enemy tank making sure its too close for the enemy tank to aim that low it could be abit op.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
The server had it before. It was used and it saw similar KDA to any tank. I would place its KDA to 1.0.
We replace the Chieftain with the old MARS15
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
The MARS15 used to be one of 17thAR most used tanks. It was the equivalent of the TAM. Im not sure when but it got removed.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Unique tactics not much health which makes it vulnerable. Relatively Slow (which is a plus for the enemy) but low in height (plus for NATO tacticts)
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Depends on who you ask. the tank is small and lower in height which could make it either headglitch if there are any areas or if someone goes and rams the enemy tank making sure its too close for the enemy tank to aim that low it could be abit op.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
The server had it before. It was used and it saw similar KDA to any tank. I would place its KDA to 1.0.
Upvote
2
Donator
Developer
Artist Team
