Restricted wars no B2s or airstrikes etc

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Makes it so you cant B2 or use tac tablet in a restricted war

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
More of a fair war if one side doesn't have CPT+ or High command

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
cant use air support tab on the tac tablet in war when restricted

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Because it makes it fair for both sides when there aren't as many people online giving each side the same chance of winning a war instead of going against higher ranks when they can use B2s Airstrikes UAVs etc when one side cant. a negative is you cant use war funds in restricted wars as much as people may want but overall is a better experience for everyone when numbers are low
 
Jul 10, 2021
466
88
111
Neutral
I'd +Support if restricted wars could only be minors or victories, but quite often assets are used to prevent a major vic on restricted wars so, I'd say for that I don't agree.

If restricted wars were changed to not have major vic campaign score value, or maybe 1/2 of the campaign score given out for restricted wars, I'd agree.