Denied Reverse the 076 speed change

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Reverse the 076 speed debuff

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
No, I have not seen any other similar suggestion.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
1; makes 076 usefull again
2;makes people who bought VIP for SCPs happy again

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Backlash from certain players.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
-
Ever since the speed debuff 076 has been getting terminated MINUTES after he breaches (that's if he breaches at all anymore,since in CI comms they say "its shit now" all the time).
And the reason that's how it is is because 076 is a CLOSE RANGE melee SCP, you need solid speed to be usefull and not a 5 second sprint with a 10 second cooldown like it is now.
 
We've terminated 076 within minutes before and after this change, just use beams..
He's one of the easiest SCP's to deal with, I've made it a point to actually recontain him, because its so easy.
1760214356938.png
the unique thing about 076 was his speed otherwise he just a dude with a sword and weaker version of 682
+Support
should honestly just get rework if people don't like his speed so much then they can have a version that has more options of weaponry to utilize
 
Should really make a suggestion to make him stronger in an alternative way...

This will just get denied since no one liked his sprint gameplay loop.
 
MASSIVE - SUPPORT

NO fuck NO. Nobody besides the 076 (and CI) liked him having that. As Auburn put it. Your entire gameplay loop is Snort a line of coke And swing a stick like a mad chimp. While you had a small hitbox and could 3 shot. AND you could break Heavy blast doors. Its a much needed nerf and never needs to come back

If CI aren't Breaching him cause hes not OP anymore. Thats a CI problem not a 076 problem.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.