What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Clarifies that Foundation and Global Occult Coalition personnel may not immediately kill Civilians within their base that aren't breaking rules(such as Parawatch entering Site-65), unless the individual is armed, hacking, or otherwise posing a threat to someone's life that isn't their own.
This forces both GOC, and F security, to RP with the trespasser, leading to more RP conducive action overall for both sides, since Parawatch(and other Civilian roles) require an RP reason to enter the site, while the GOC, and F security, do not require an RP reason to kill them if they are trespassing, which I believed to be in violation of Rule 1.1, but an Admin specified it wasn't, in which this rule clarification was suggested.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Yes, but I was informed by an Admin (kayla - STEAM_0:0:45057867) and a group of other SL (unspecified) that the clarification made here is invalid and no longer enforced.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
+ More RP between Civ. / MTF or Security.
+ Can lead to RP conducive firefights in appropriate scenarios.
+ More accurate to what the Foundation would actually do, specifically the motto "we die in the dark so you can live in the light".
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Civilians might shoot Foundation on sight.
- Civilians might end up feeling like fighting disguised D-Class personnel occasionally.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I believe a re-instatement and enforcement of this rule would be appropriate for additional RP between F / GOC and Civilian roles entering the site, rather than F being able to immediately kill any surface role on-sight because they are classified as an intruder(even if they're doing nothing wrong / being cooperative).
Clarifies that Foundation and Global Occult Coalition personnel may not immediately kill Civilians within their base that aren't breaking rules(such as Parawatch entering Site-65), unless the individual is armed, hacking, or otherwise posing a threat to someone's life that isn't their own.
This forces both GOC, and F security, to RP with the trespasser, leading to more RP conducive action overall for both sides, since Parawatch(and other Civilian roles) require an RP reason to enter the site, while the GOC, and F security, do not require an RP reason to kill them if they are trespassing, which I believed to be in violation of Rule 1.1, but an Admin specified it wasn't, in which this rule clarification was suggested.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Yes, but I was informed by an Admin (kayla - STEAM_0:0:45057867) and a group of other SL (unspecified) that the clarification made here is invalid and no longer enforced.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
+ More RP between Civ. / MTF or Security.
+ Can lead to RP conducive firefights in appropriate scenarios.
+ More accurate to what the Foundation would actually do, specifically the motto "we die in the dark so you can live in the light".
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Civilians might shoot Foundation on sight.
- Civilians might end up feeling like fighting disguised D-Class personnel occasionally.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I believe a re-instatement and enforcement of this rule would be appropriate for additional RP between F / GOC and Civilian roles entering the site, rather than F being able to immediately kill any surface role on-sight because they are classified as an intruder(even if they're doing nothing wrong / being cooperative).
Game Master
Donator
Head Moderator
SCP-RP Staff
Event Team
Group Moderator