Head Moderator
MilitaryRP Staff
Platform Team
DonatorWhat does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Clarify/Modify Rule 1.15 Spawncamping
Currently, the rule reads as followed:
1.15 Spawn Camping - You can not kill someone directly outside their spawn unless they interact with you within combat or RP, MTF cannot shell with a LAV/BTR past Chaos Insurgency's Garage unless an active CI member is engaged in combat with the armed vehicle. (e.g shooting at you within their spawn or trying to capture you.)
This suggestion proposes to possibly either change or clarify on the part "MTF cannot shell with a LAV/BTR past Chaos Insurgency's Garage unless an active CI member is engaged with the armed vehicle.
Either possibly clarify what "Engaged with the armed vehicle" or change it to say "Shot at with explosives, such as Matador/Sticky Grenade/Grenades".
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Would clear up confusion regarding this rule.
Would make it more clear for people participating in a raid on CI regarding this rule.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Would take a small bit of time to change ?
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Honestly, would just clear up any confusion in the future.
Clarify/Modify Rule 1.15 Spawncamping
Currently, the rule reads as followed:
1.15 Spawn Camping - You can not kill someone directly outside their spawn unless they interact with you within combat or RP, MTF cannot shell with a LAV/BTR past Chaos Insurgency's Garage unless an active CI member is engaged in combat with the armed vehicle. (e.g shooting at you within their spawn or trying to capture you.)
This suggestion proposes to possibly either change or clarify on the part "MTF cannot shell with a LAV/BTR past Chaos Insurgency's Garage unless an active CI member is engaged with the armed vehicle.
Either possibly clarify what "Engaged with the armed vehicle" or change it to say "Shot at with explosives, such as Matador/Sticky Grenade/Grenades".
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Would clear up confusion regarding this rule.
Would make it more clear for people participating in a raid on CI regarding this rule.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Would take a small bit of time to change ?
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Honestly, would just clear up any confusion in the future.
Group Moderator