Denied SC Disabling communications.

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Critical

Senior Administrator
Senior Administrator
SCP-RP Staff
Platform Team
Event Team
Donator
Group Moderator
Jun 6, 2022
265
41
41
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
The ability for site command to "disconnect" peoples communications devices that are members of the foundation. This will be used in the event of something major occurring such as a SCP-008 breach which people inside the facility are being amnesticated for and that one person who has a "bio suit which blocks Class-B" or "a gas mask which filters amnestics" or that are "outside the facility so I remember everything" cannot info breach something that shouldn't be info leaked allowing RP to continue as they verbally leak info to people whilst ISD chase after them to get them amnesticated.
Prevents staff interventions blocking potential roleplay situations.
Makes sense as Site Command would be able to moderate things like this by "blacklisting" members communication devices like timing out a discord user.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Increases duties of ISD and other MTF regiments who need to track these people down.
Decreases fail info leaks from occurring.
Another hidden power that site command use only when required making them more feared as anyone could be silenced at any time.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Admittedly could be linked to power gaming.
Means info leaks would be less impacting as opposed to what they are currently.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Fail info leaks such as the ones we would use the "blocks communication devices of PLAYER" on will be reduced (to an extent) and it allows more RP to happen as opposed to staff grabbing the player and removing their rights.
From what I have listed there are more positives as opposed to negatives that I can see.
The only negative that realistically stands would be power gaming however with this being introduced SL and SC can talk about when it will be acceptable to be used to prevent rule breaking.
 

Naffen

Senior Administrator
Senior Administrator
SCP-RP Staff
Platform Team
Donator
Group Moderator
Apr 11, 2022
364
1
126
91
+support, think some similar suggestion was already made about a type of comms blackout that SC would be able to enact
 

Bill Nye The Guy

Active member
May 28, 2022
1,015
182
21
-support unless CI can use it to disable comms it'd be a useless addition since it can already be dealt with without this- dev time to disable comms would probably be quite annoying as well
 

Critical

Senior Administrator
Senior Administrator
SCP-RP Staff
Platform Team
Event Team
Donator
Group Moderator
Jun 6, 2022
265
41
41
-support unless CI can use it to disable comms it'd be a useless addition since it can already be dealt with without this- dev time to disable comms would probably be quite annoying as well
Not an actual communication jamming system. I am talking about doing something like
/c3 *Disables communication devices registered with Nu-7 Neil Carmine*
 

Simon "Kitton" A.

Active member
Apr 16, 2022
266
47
21
Suggestion Denied



Hi Critical,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.
The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons.

We do not wish for Site Command to just casually soft-mute someone off communications.
At the same time, just like suggested above a similar suggestion has been approved.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.