Before I leave a verdict, could you answer the following:
1. What storylines have you led or been heavily involved in?
2. In your position of SA and DoIA, what roleplay have you created departmentally or site wide?
I haven't been able to find this in your application, and I would be leaving a -support without. A lot of your application speaks on essentially operating the facility controls whether its in personnel or hitting big ole' CL4 buttons. As a ECM you'd be a roleplay leader, your primary concern wouldn't be managing the site (and realistically an Ethics member should never be doing so unless there's no SA/O5 on). This is something I feel that you are lacking on, but if it was an oversight on the application I would look towards leaving a positive verdict.
You are superb in a perspective of administrative and management, but that isn't what the role is about. All CL5 slots are about the creation of roleplay and heavy interaction seeing your ideas come to light. So not a project that's handed and "oh no one interacted", a project you have assigned, you go to that department for check-ins, you give them support. That is where your management skills would come really positively into play, but in your roles you have had the perfect positions to create this roleplay and hence me checking as I am unaware of any you have done so.
An addition that would help your application is about code blacks to the eventual use of the Alpha Warhead. The process. Why we do it this way, etc.
Otherwise, something I do heavily recommend you read is:
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/tanhony-s-proposal
This is what the S.C.P. servers EC is based on.
Good luck!