Name: Jay Owen
Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:158291093
Please state if it is for SCP-RP UK or USA: UK
Level of appeal (2 or 3): 2
Have you already carried out a level 1 appeal - please give details: Level 1 was the ingame tribunal where a 2.5 hours long RP session happened in which none of our voices were listened to or questions answered. Anytime a question came up when we had an E11 unit on the witness stand, the acting judge, Ethics Member Athena, would not allow it to pass to get out the answers.
Who did you carry out the level 1 appeal to, and where: Tribunal Court.
Rank demoted from: CPT To SGT /a Perma Strike (which is again bit too much)
Who demoted you?: Judges:Athena Ethics SC
Prosecution: Site Advisor Cameron
Date of demotion?: 02.06.2023
What is the case against you?: Interference 1 / Kidnapping 1 / Misuse Solitary 1 / Protocol 1/Misuse 2
Is this true?: NO, At this point I am being treated as if I TOOK E11 out of HCZ and stripped his stuff when this was just a routine Code 1 check, the E11 just happened to be that person today nothing else. There are many ways to check DCs this is just one of em.
Interference 1
The E-11 was enforcing the FLC, however the Nu-7 CPT was simply doing his duties. This does not interfere with it due to the fact that he did not prevent the E-11 from arresting the Tech Expert, but simply checking if he was truly E-11 and not a CI Deepcover.
Kidnapping 1
The Nu-7 CPT has reasonable suspicion to assume that the E-11 may be a Deep Cover, due to the fact that a CODE 1 was active, Presence of a CI Deepcover in HCZ was reported and the E-11 was dragging a Tech Expert in a Hazmat suit through HCZ.
Misuse Solitary 1
The E-11 was not imprisoned with the usage of the IA Jail System, but simply detained in HCZ to check if he was truly an E-11.
Protocol 1
The Nu-7 was simply following protocol. He had reasonable suspicion that the E-11 could be a Deepcover and did everything he could to check if he was real or not.
Misuse 2
The only equipment that could've been misused was the Restraints. However, Nu-7 CO's spawn with Restraints and he had reasonable suspicion to restrain the E-11 to check if he was legitimate.
Prior to this demotion, have you ever been demoted?: Never/Nor a Strike.
Please list any previous roleplay demotion appeals: Non apart from this one.
What is your side of the story?:
Prior to this incident, there were reports of heavy numbers of Chaos Insurgency present inside of the HCZ area.
Myself and other Nu-7 members responded to the code 1. During this response, we were unaware that E-11 had set up a checkpoint at the blastdoor of Lower HCZ. Upon arrival, I witnessed an E-11 dragging a restrained Tech expert as shown in Exhibit B (00:00 - 00:10).
When myself and an Nu-7 SPC encountered the E-11, the Tech Expert screamed that the E-11 was an imposter, which is Exhibit B (00:04 - 00:07).
When the SPC finished the ID Check, I decided to check him myself, which is also seen in Exhibit B (00:16 - 00:18).
When his ID checked out, I requested for him to hand over the restrained Tech expert. When the E-11 explained that the tech expert was trespassing. I decided to restrain the E-11 to do some extra checks to ensure that this E-11 was telling the truth and was in fact not a CI Deepcover.
As shown in Exhibit C, after restraining him, I blindfolded and gagged him, as we do with everyone who we suspect is a CI Deepcover to prevent them from taking cyanide and/or calling out their location to other CI members.
After checking him, asking in comms about the E-11 and checking his keycards, we received reports in comms that the CI Deepcover was terminated, which is shown in Exhibit C (00:52).
After this, we handed the E-11 over to another E-11 who came to pick him up, which is shown in exhibit C (01:18 - 01:34). This was the end of it.
The Incident lasted at most 3 and a half minutes and ended with no one being harmed in any way.
Evidence
Disclaimer
All the evidence was taken from the original court case (None of this was tampered in any way or form)
Examine all aspects of evidence provided by Defended (Written text in Chat on right side and Audio heard within the videos) as these are crucial parts of the evidence.
Exhibit A:
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1bAUDuwqdjDWOY/d1337HkgC2bz?invite=cr-MSx4MjgsNjA2MTMwMyw
Context for Exhibit A:
The E-11 interacting with the tech expert for the first time
Exhibit B:
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1bAV3DdV4Pa1bq/d1337XChxExX?invite=cr-MSxkVzksNjA2MTMwMyw
Context for Exhibit B:
Jay Owen and another Nu-7 interacting with the E-11 for the first time
Exibit C:
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1bAVLZj7hWkp_J/d1337qwXOSh3?invite=cr-MSxNbzEsNjA2MTMwMyw
Context for Exhibit C:
The E-11 was suspected of being a CI and was detained
Exhibit D:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BI535hiLmHiZ-Ii_1cf6J7Ar5Vr4UXSwLXfhwztrDEg/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/...ouid=101689701456407821319&rtpof=true&sd=true
Exhibit D Context:
Court summon and Court citation documents issued to Jay Owen himself
Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:158291093
Please state if it is for SCP-RP UK or USA: UK
Level of appeal (2 or 3): 2
Have you already carried out a level 1 appeal - please give details: Level 1 was the ingame tribunal where a 2.5 hours long RP session happened in which none of our voices were listened to or questions answered. Anytime a question came up when we had an E11 unit on the witness stand, the acting judge, Ethics Member Athena, would not allow it to pass to get out the answers.
Who did you carry out the level 1 appeal to, and where: Tribunal Court.
Rank demoted from: CPT To SGT /a Perma Strike (which is again bit too much)
Who demoted you?: Judges:Athena Ethics SC
Prosecution: Site Advisor Cameron
Date of demotion?: 02.06.2023
What is the case against you?: Interference 1 / Kidnapping 1 / Misuse Solitary 1 / Protocol 1/Misuse 2
Is this true?: NO, At this point I am being treated as if I TOOK E11 out of HCZ and stripped his stuff when this was just a routine Code 1 check, the E11 just happened to be that person today nothing else. There are many ways to check DCs this is just one of em.
Interference 1
The E-11 was enforcing the FLC, however the Nu-7 CPT was simply doing his duties. This does not interfere with it due to the fact that he did not prevent the E-11 from arresting the Tech Expert, but simply checking if he was truly E-11 and not a CI Deepcover.
Kidnapping 1
The Nu-7 CPT has reasonable suspicion to assume that the E-11 may be a Deep Cover, due to the fact that a CODE 1 was active, Presence of a CI Deepcover in HCZ was reported and the E-11 was dragging a Tech Expert in a Hazmat suit through HCZ.
Misuse Solitary 1
The E-11 was not imprisoned with the usage of the IA Jail System, but simply detained in HCZ to check if he was truly an E-11.
Protocol 1
The Nu-7 was simply following protocol. He had reasonable suspicion that the E-11 could be a Deepcover and did everything he could to check if he was real or not.
Misuse 2
The only equipment that could've been misused was the Restraints. However, Nu-7 CO's spawn with Restraints and he had reasonable suspicion to restrain the E-11 to check if he was legitimate.
Prior to this demotion, have you ever been demoted?: Never/Nor a Strike.
Please list any previous roleplay demotion appeals: Non apart from this one.
What is your side of the story?:
Prior to this incident, there were reports of heavy numbers of Chaos Insurgency present inside of the HCZ area.
Myself and other Nu-7 members responded to the code 1. During this response, we were unaware that E-11 had set up a checkpoint at the blastdoor of Lower HCZ. Upon arrival, I witnessed an E-11 dragging a restrained Tech expert as shown in Exhibit B (00:00 - 00:10).
When myself and an Nu-7 SPC encountered the E-11, the Tech Expert screamed that the E-11 was an imposter, which is Exhibit B (00:04 - 00:07).
When the SPC finished the ID Check, I decided to check him myself, which is also seen in Exhibit B (00:16 - 00:18).
When his ID checked out, I requested for him to hand over the restrained Tech expert. When the E-11 explained that the tech expert was trespassing. I decided to restrain the E-11 to do some extra checks to ensure that this E-11 was telling the truth and was in fact not a CI Deepcover.
As shown in Exhibit C, after restraining him, I blindfolded and gagged him, as we do with everyone who we suspect is a CI Deepcover to prevent them from taking cyanide and/or calling out their location to other CI members.
After checking him, asking in comms about the E-11 and checking his keycards, we received reports in comms that the CI Deepcover was terminated, which is shown in Exhibit C (00:52).
After this, we handed the E-11 over to another E-11 who came to pick him up, which is shown in exhibit C (01:18 - 01:34). This was the end of it.
The Incident lasted at most 3 and a half minutes and ended with no one being harmed in any way.
Evidence
Disclaimer
All the evidence was taken from the original court case (None of this was tampered in any way or form)
Examine all aspects of evidence provided by Defended (Written text in Chat on right side and Audio heard within the videos) as these are crucial parts of the evidence.
Exhibit A:
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1bAUDuwqdjDWOY/d1337HkgC2bz?invite=cr-MSx4MjgsNjA2MTMwMyw
Context for Exhibit A:
The E-11 interacting with the tech expert for the first time
Exhibit B:
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1bAV3DdV4Pa1bq/d1337XChxExX?invite=cr-MSxkVzksNjA2MTMwMyw
Context for Exhibit B:
Jay Owen and another Nu-7 interacting with the E-11 for the first time
Exibit C:
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1bAVLZj7hWkp_J/d1337qwXOSh3?invite=cr-MSxNbzEsNjA2MTMwMyw
Context for Exhibit C:
The E-11 was suspected of being a CI and was detained
Exhibit D:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BI535hiLmHiZ-Ii_1cf6J7Ar5Vr4UXSwLXfhwztrDEg/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/...ouid=101689701456407821319&rtpof=true&sd=true
Exhibit D Context:
Court summon and Court citation documents issued to Jay Owen himself
Last edited:
