Thanks for the feedback, I've held many positions that I haven't been "removed" from, From Site Director, ECM to O5-2 and many other roles whilst you were gone. I'm unsure if you're are aware of the separation between IC and OOC actions but usually they don't correlate when it comes to interactions with others in regards to my current character.
Hope this clears things from your perspective.
I am aware that there is positions you have managed to keep, and you did well in those roles.
The issue is, at least from my standpoint is that this is becoming a pattern. You do REALLY well, and then its a sudden hard slip.
You see, with this comment issue a lot of people are taking, the fact you're applying for CL4 while saying that isn't the issue, its the fact you've said it and they're entitled to that viewpoint. And to the other comments at Falcon, he has been given permission from Supers to apply for the role, which I hope people read this part at the minimum of my long wall and respect that. Essentially, if you take issue with his comments, take this to staff in a complaint, it has been outlined here and that is good, but action will not be taken until you make that step. I recommend it. And I am sure Falcon would too.
My main issue stems from the good ole saying of, "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me" but realistically who do you shame at position number 12?
I have no doubt in your roleplay ability, its exactly why I appreciate in my prior comment about your want to create roleplay, I just think it creates a false story that you list all of these historic roles infront of potentially new players or uninformed players that you were removed from them, same for your SL positions.
I truly would love to see if you got this that this is the position you stay in, you climb and in the future do incredibly well and no removal, but I also need to air on the side of caution that you've presented yourself as a historic player with a good foundation of roles, which you did achieve, but many of which as you've admitted you did not keep. Hence my -support.
As for the LOAs thats more than understandable, and I retract my vtime comment.
Best of luck. My verdict will stay the same. I hope this expansion better explains this.