I'd like to ask you some questions before I leave my verdict whilst also running my opinion in parallel to what Broda has said.
1) How long exactly have you been OSA and Executive Researcher?
2) Can you list your top three RP creations or projects at this moment in time and elaborate on them? (Stop using the excuse that this could spoil things for players by revealing project details. This is a Site Command application, you need to lay all your cards on the table for everyone to make an actual informed opinion.)
3) Can you explain what your time in OSA has taught you about being an effective member of SC by learning from the existing players?
To go to what Broda said, the problem I have is that I have seen you a lot, but on the Assistant job. This means that the majority of your roleplay is secretive or closed off from the rest of the Foundation players, thus meaning that we need you to explain to us why we should pick you. Personally, I think that existing senior CL4 experience is a major plus but is unnecessary and we have gotten SC members before without it; Say what you will about Eidolon for example but his tenure as Chairman was I believe over a year prior to him attempting to reapply to O5 recently and he didn't even have a CL4 role at the time, yet he was almost certainly on the verge of being selected given the response to his application.
Times change - you are evidently part of the current gameplay loop and thus you COULD be a strong candidate. It's clear from other replies that you have good qualities, it is now on you to sell yourself as to why you should be chosen, so I encourage you to stop holding the cards to your chest and elaborate.
In regards to the application itself;
Details regarding duties of the O5 in and out RP are fine
Candidate has a long tenure of working with O5 due to his Assistant role
Candidate appears to have worked on a variety of in-depth RP scenarios with different departments
Candidate NEEDS to elaborate further on what his projects and work actually entail and how that makes him suited for SC. Almost certain in my mind you'll be denied if you don't.
Candidate lore documentation is honestly quite weak. It's clear you've been maintaining this document as you've moved around CL4 positions, but I always dislike simple retellings of old events without lore to look to the future of your time on the server.
I eagerly await a reply, so I can make a decision. As of now, Neutral.
1) How long exactly have you been OSA and Executive Researcher?
2) Can you list your top three RP creations or projects at this moment in time and elaborate on them? (Stop using the excuse that this could spoil things for players by revealing project details. This is a Site Command application, you need to lay all your cards on the table for everyone to make an actual informed opinion.)
3) Can you explain what your time in OSA has taught you about being an effective member of SC by learning from the existing players?
To go to what Broda said, the problem I have is that I have seen you a lot, but on the Assistant job. This means that the majority of your roleplay is secretive or closed off from the rest of the Foundation players, thus meaning that we need you to explain to us why we should pick you. Personally, I think that existing senior CL4 experience is a major plus but is unnecessary and we have gotten SC members before without it; Say what you will about Eidolon for example but his tenure as Chairman was I believe over a year prior to him attempting to reapply to O5 recently and he didn't even have a CL4 role at the time, yet he was almost certainly on the verge of being selected given the response to his application.
Times change - you are evidently part of the current gameplay loop and thus you COULD be a strong candidate. It's clear from other replies that you have good qualities, it is now on you to sell yourself as to why you should be chosen, so I encourage you to stop holding the cards to your chest and elaborate.
In regards to the application itself;
Details regarding duties of the O5 in and out RP are fine
Candidate has a long tenure of working with O5 due to his Assistant role
Candidate appears to have worked on a variety of in-depth RP scenarios with different departments
Candidate NEEDS to elaborate further on what his projects and work actually entail and how that makes him suited for SC. Almost certain in my mind you'll be denied if you don't.
Candidate lore documentation is honestly quite weak. It's clear you've been maintaining this document as you've moved around CL4 positions, but I always dislike simple retellings of old events without lore to look to the future of your time on the server.
I eagerly await a reply, so I can make a decision. As of now, Neutral.