Rule Suggestion UNGOC Senior Position Rank Increase

Rule suggestions will be reviewed by Superadmins, this may take longer than standard content suggestions.
Aphex

Aphex

Game Master
Game Master
One Year Club Two Year Club Three Year Club Conversation Starter
Jan 27, 2022
707
139
111
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Change the ruling for 1.17, wherein a person cannot hold another senior position while also being unable to be a UNGOC LT. CI members can make it to DELCOM while holding a Senior Position, I don't see why the same cannot apply for UNGOC.

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Unsure, possibly.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Allows current senior position holders to get to GOC LT without breaking any rules.
Makes the ruling align with CIs BCOM+ limit.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
I believe the rule is to allow more non-senior position holders to access GOC REGCOM and to reduce burnout for senior position holders, so of course this is a negative if it was increased.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Currently, UK GOC needs more COs, and I believe this would have a minimal negative effect. If someone is burned out on GOC, they can make an LOA/ROA, or even just resign from the position. If this needs to be tested beforehand, then go ahead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Acey and Change Z. "The Coward"
Upvote 15 Downvote
Acey

Acey

Civil Gamers Expert
One Year Club Two Year Club Conversation Starter
Dec 26, 2022
148
42
111
Croatia, Republic of
+SUPPORT
Honestly I had no clue about this being like this, I always thought they had the same limit as us; No wonder that GOC longevity is just dead in the water.

I might be biased but I've always personally believed that it'd be fair if people could make it to LT on one faction while having a similar or higher rank on another.

IF people genuinely want to hold both positions and put in the time / effort in maintaining said positions, I really don't think it would be a problem, especially because you've mentioned that GOC is missing COs which are in my opinion rather crucial in RP ( Yes it can be done without them and to a great extent but there are certain limits and authority that NCOs / Enlisted have ).

This would also increase GOC's activity as CL4 roles, be they junior or senior keep people motivated and engaged ( Or at least have the capability of doing so )!

Lastly, as he previously mentioned - Worst case scenario is where someone makes an LOA / ROA or just quits the position ( At which point they can be replaced ) or if they somehow cannot meet those requirements get demoted back to 1sgt and can reapply at another time when they can be on!

( Also LTs are jr. CL4 in character anyway lol lmao )
 
Aphex

Aphex

Game Master
Game Master
One Year Club Two Year Club Three Year Club Conversation Starter
Jan 27, 2022
707
139
111
Easton Maker said:
From my knowledge, LTs do significantly more than DELCOMs. The reason for the initial change in making DELCOMs Jr Cl4 is because they do jack shit, and SL wanted someone to be able to auth raids without a Sr being on. This could help with GOC players numbers though so idk

+/- Mixed support
Click to expand...
I find it ridiculous that from 1SGT you are a CL3 position, but then just straight to a Sr CL4 position when you get LT. That means that there are ZERO Jr CL4 positions outside of Attachés, which I don’t even know the actual position of in the GOC chain of command, it might be written down somewhere.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom