Denied [USA] Give Internal Affairs Armor Batteries

[Scopes]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Add Armor Batteries to IA bunks.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Internal Affairs Agent won't have to stress running to security sector or medbay just to grab armor.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
A little re-work within their bunks for placements.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
This should be accepted due to the fact that DEA Operatives already get armor batteries but IA agents / Operatives do not. I feel like this is unfair to IA and gives DEA more of an advantage with their ease of access to armor. If IA gets some then I believe this would help out a lot and make IA stronger.

Refer to the images below

First picture we have is that DEA have armor batteries here that are infinite and they can get easy supply here.




However in the second picture this is the IA bunks and it shows that they do not have armor batteries.



The third picture i'm showing is a place where we could put armor batteries and perhaps a table added onto it.

PS : I'm not complaining on how the fact that DEA get armor and IA don't I'm just saying both I feel like deserve armor batteries as it makes no sense why one room would have one rather the other one does not.

 

[Michael Dzhetnikov]

We can go next door to DEA anyways. Its unneeded, there is also one in medbay.

 

[YoRHaUmbra]

-support

As the person above stated

 

[Scopes]

We can go next door to DEA anyways. Its unneeded, there is also one in medbay.

Last time I tried to enter DEA bunks they told me to get out. DEA do not like IA.

 

[Archie Bambozzini]

not leaving a + or - support but IA is mainly non combative so armour wouldnt make sense for them

 

["Arachnid"]

Me when non combative cant combat very well (I wonder why)
-Support

 

[Nightmare]

-Support
They are literally non combatants.

 

[Khan]

-support

 

[Harold Hawks]

+Support

We are NOT non-combative. We are semi-combative. We are not allowed to engage hostile SCPs or GOIs given that they do not have us cornered. Otherwise we have almost free reign. Especially during investigations.

-support non-combatives

-Support
They are literally non combatants.

Me when non combative cant combat very well (I wonder why)
-Support

 

[Niox]

-Support

 

[Second]

+Support

We are NOT non-combative. We are semi-combative. We are not allowed to engage hostile SCPs or GOIs given that they do not have us cornered. Otherwise we have almost free reign. Especially during investigations.

While yes, compared to DEA, MTF, Security, etc. IA is not as combative so it is not a priority. Also, GSD Cadets and Officers are full combatives and don't have access at all unless a CL3 opens SS Armory or Medbay Armory

 

[Rushi]

Suggestion Denied

---

Hi @Scopes,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.

The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion because if Internal Affairs need armor, then they can simply go to the armory and get it there.

This should be accepted due to the fact that DEA Operatives already get armor batteries but IA agents / Operatives do not. I feel like this is unfair to IA and gives DEA more of an advantage with their ease of access to armor. If IA gets some then I believe this would help out a lot and make IA stronger.

I will say aswell, that giving the reasoning "others have it, then we should have it", will result in your suggestion to be denied.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​