Partially Accepted War score of tanks and k17 2 missiles

Content that has been partially accepted
Status
Not open for further replies.
What does this suggestion change is to add
[Add a second missile to the puma and remove the second missile from the bradley also

add more warscore if a tank is destroyed than a car for example]

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
[Not to my knowledge]

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
[Positive that destroying tanks is more rewarding for your team no negitives i can think off

for the other suggestion positive more balanced ifvs ifv combat]

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
[The quality of the players experience on the server would improve for armored regiments]
 
Upvote 0
Mar 15, 2023
111
15
61
Neutral +/-
I would +Support this but the difference between the survivability between a car and a tank is not very large at all meaning that the war score difference would have to be the same, making it pointless to be implemented at the moment
 
-support
Mainly cause, removing the Missiles from Bradley, would make it just a Boxer M2 with explosive bullets, and worse driving, it's one of the things that Infantry gets, that's really good, to deal with infantry, ground, and air units,

But I do think that NWO lacks the 3 ATGM we get in NATO, we get the Bradley, Puma, and Marder iirc, while NWO only gets the BTR90 I think
 
Nov 26, 2021
18
0
111
-support

As magic mentioned nato has acces to Bradley, Puma, and Marder were now only has their k17 but i fell like ur trying to change smt thats Alr balanced
Since k17 Alr is easily destroyed and what u suggest would be a unfair advantage to nato given u would still have 2 atgm units

Ig u wanted to go through whit This nato should be reduce to 2 atgms so its equivelent to nwo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.