Denied Warfund System Rework

[Second]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion would be to overhaul the Warfund system in the following ways:

CI and Foundation will now have a Warfund and will their respective groups will receive Warfund for surface ops, not just GOC. This will incentivize more activity with Nu-7/B-1(Or DEA, if they get surface ops)/CI

Adds the "Tactical Tablet" to these specific jobs:
- CI - Officer
- CI - Commanding Officer
- CI - Commander
- O5-1 - O5-4
- Ethics Committee Member
- Ethics Committee Chairman
- Site Manager
- Site Director
- Nu-7 Hammer Down - Commander*
- Nu-7 Hammer Down - Officer*
*These are big maybes, and could be excluded.
This would be more RP Realistic, as both the Foundation and CI are backed by VERY wealthy benefactors and have the funds to call in drone strikes, bombing runs, etc.

Adds a "Trade" feature to the Tactical Tablet to allow CI GOC and Foundation to trade Warfunds for negotiations, deals, etc.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
+ More use of the Warfund system
+ RP Realistic
+ Incentivizes surface ops for Foundation and CI

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- May be abused (Excessive Force rules apply and may have to be reworked)
- Potentially would imbalance Surface Combat (+May improve surface combat by changing the meta)
- Dev time

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Overall, this suggestion would allow the Warfund system to be more RP realistic and utilized more often which would shake up Surface warfare and potentially even mitigate the "Sniper Meta" that CI and Foundation have found themselves in. Of course maybe the Tactical Tablets offerings for Foundation and CI could be changed so every GoI feels unique.

 

[moonyguru]

+support I want to download games on tablet

 

[SamPaval]

Manger and director has zero need for it.

Same with ethics

U are taking away what makes goc special -support

 

[Monker]

+ support

 

[Ramuh]

+Support
Overall would be cool, winning wars could result in getting more war funds for the winning faction & stuff
Maybe different things you can do w/ the tactical tablet would be nice

 

[Evil]

+support
people that should be allow to use war fund
-Nu7 officers
-Nu7 commander
-B1 officers
-B1 commander
-05 council
-Director of intelligence agency
- CI - Officer
- CI - Commanding Officer
- CI - Commander
The reason why site manager/director and ethics shouldn't have it is because they are the people that do the paper work not the combat stuff and it wouldn't make sense for an ethics member to fire missile when they are most of time inside the facility.

 

[Snow]

-support

 

[James "Baker" | "Pilgrim"]

+support

 

["Aki"]

Manger and director has zero need for it.

Same with ethics

U are taking away what makes goc special -support

orange suit? really good weapons? 11 surface field operatives with spycard, anomaly destruction beam?


+Support,

I personally think this will make surface wars so much more fire, the sound of "Airstike incoming" is sick and will make wars 20x more fun

 

[SamPaval]

orange suit? really good weapons? 11 surface field operatives with spycard, anomaly destruction beam?


+Support,

I personally think this will make surface wars so much more fire, the sound of "Airstike incoming" is sick and will make wars 20x more fun

Ci has good weapons u have DCs and jug this will only take away from goc as who gives af about the destruction beamz

 

[Snow]

Ci has good weapons u have DCs and jug this will only take away from goc as who gives af about the destruction beamz

bro goc also has jug and dc replica you high or smth?

 

[Darren]

Ci has good weapons u have DCs and jug this will only take away from goc as who gives af about the destruction beamz

doesnt goc also have a juggernaut better weapons than ci MSBS kbar clone with no recoil S-TAC m240b best LMG in the game for juggernauts and a 44. Magnum side arm ontop of having 3 dc slots beating ci and its 2 slots and having Orange suits / mech suits with anomaly destruction beams?

 

[SamPaval]

doesnt goc also have a juggernaut better weapons than ci MSBS kbar clone with no recoil S-TAC m240b best LMG in the game for juggernauts and a 44. Magnum side arm ontop of having 3 dc slots beating ci and its 2 slots and having Orange suits / mech suits with anomaly destruction beams?

if we give everyone else GOCs shit then nobody will play goc and go for the more active roles.................

 

[Darren]

if we give everyone else GOCs shit then nobody will play goc and go for the more active roles.................

what people play goc for the rp you should never join a regiment for its loudouts goc already has more than ci and foundation without the warfunds and tact tablet

 

[legionnaires6]

what people play goc for the rp you should never join a regiment for its loudouts goc already has more than ci and foundation without the warfunds and tact tablet

The issues for the GOC rp requires “Power” to make other respect what GOC wants to propose, if simply CI and F both have stuff that can make themselves ignore it. Then what’s the point of it?

For example CI and foundation can both ignore civilian issue simply because there are no potential balance of terror anymore. Since now they all have air strikes and stuff.

 

[legionnaires6]

what people play goc for the rp you should never join a regiment for its loudouts goc already has more than ci and foundation without the warfunds and tact tablet

And to be clear here this is SCP RP, not MRP. And simply if we really want to follow the standards of lore. Both CI and Foundation probably would not exist at this small spot in Canada, because if it’s actual GOC then both would have been wiped by thermal nuclear as foundation always have surface breach and constant CI endangered pinewood humanity.

 

[Darren]

And to be clear here this is SCP RP, not MRP. And simply if we really want to follow the standards of lore. Both CI and Foundation probably would not exist at this small spot in Canada, because if it’s actual GOC then both would have been wiped by thermal nuclear as foundation always have surface breach and constant CI endangered pinewood humanity.

yes it is but from my stance on the UK goc does not at all need a buff i see those goc generals with 4X scope 44.magnums shooting civis and CI and nu-7 also airstriking consatntly and being a constant threat to ci

 

[SamPaval]

The issues for the GOC rp requires “Power” to make other respect what GOC wants to propose, if simply CI and F both have stuff that can make themselves ignore it. Then what’s the point of it?

For example CI and foundation can both ignore civilian issue simply because there are no potential balance of terror anymore. Since now they all have air strikes and stuff.

+ this.

What would the point in making treatys/allying with GOC.

Ci only makes pacs with then to use the airstrikes and buffs from destruction beams.

Giving them this there is no incentive to rp with the others cause we all have the same shit so why even do it + CI and F numbers are 2x higher

 

[Second]

doesnt goc also have a juggernaut better weapons than ci MSBS kbar clone with no recoil S-TAC m240b best LMG in the game for juggernauts and a 44. Magnum side arm ontop of having 3 dc slots beating ci and its 2 slots and having Orange suits / mech suits with anomaly destruction beams?

11 DC slots* technically because Field Ops have disguise cards too, but I believe we are only allowed 4 per infil(?) though this may just be an internal rule in US GOC

 

[legionnaires6]

I don't see any point in comparing basic-level weaponry usage to justify adding the use of a mass-destruction weapon. And no according to server ruling that Assessment Team operatives may enter for espionage once every hour this cooldown applies to normal raids as well.