Search results

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Instead of making it so that you cannot disguise a Type Blue at all, make it so that if you class F a Type Blue and disguise them, they must abide by the Fear rp of the job they are disguised as. I think this would be the fairest while still allowing...

Staff complaints won't do much in the way of "This guy made a bad ruling that got immediately corrected because I had to contact SL or higher staff to check their credibility." That really seems like it's going to either be "Sorry this happened, but he didn't do anything inherently wrong" or its...

I don't know if this is like stated but it truly does not seem so. Exmaple: I had an UK Staff tell me that GoC Attaches cannot use code names and that they didn't in the UK Server (Such as only having the codename in your name) Server Leadership had to tell them that it was allowed on the US server

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Add some sort of requirement for United Kingdom staff to staff on the US server. I don't care if they do tickets that are helping people, but I mean actual staff tickets that involve getting someone in trouble, or for minor cases like names or...

SteamID: STEAM_0:1:14248048 Discord name: Prox7116 For how long have you played on CN SCP: December 2024- Current time Age: 19 In what country are you located?: America Time zone: CST Character name(s): Gavel, Mortaniel, Johnson Mortanus Civilian name: Magnus Price Do you have a mic...

This is kind of the jist I am trying to gauge with the suggestion. The idea is this. They do something that isn't combat. This is not a dig on CI or GOC either. They play the hand they are dealt for the most part (Especially Chaos). I think a Merchant thing with the robots could be a cool idea...

Yes I am aware this is likely to get denied #What does this mean Prox? Well I will tell you. Let us all be honest here. Surface is boring. Civilians are lowkey a boring faction unless you wanna minge. Same thing with Parawatch, Same thing with MCnD, which you need to be a highest-level donator...

-Support Instead of removing it entirely, just move it up on the AA list to the level of a code black type event, the Level 3 AA or whatever it's called. Removing it completely is a little short-sighted. I understand they are OP, but if they are just controlled properly, it should not be an issue.

+1 a good member of E-11. Knows a lot of rules and rulings. Also is very calm and friendly person to talk to

+Support

[Yanderemuffin] Interrogations and long conflicts that last about 25 minutes happen all the time. [Evan and Zen] You want to know what the alternative is... people use Class B just like they did Class A, and they use it exclusively because Class A is usually useless. 30 minutes is not enough...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Change class A from a 15-minute class to 30 minutes Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: Don't think so Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): Makes Class A somewhat useful. Class A will...

Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:14248048 Discord name: Prox7116 For how long have you played on CG SCP: Been fully playing for at least 4 months. Started in 2024 though Age: 19 In what country are you located?: United States Time zone: CST Character name(s): Foundation: Mortaniel Civilian name: Morty...

While I get that, its why you would specify that if rp is already broken before mixing doesn't apply. So the situation if people wanted to fear rp they should say you have a gun on you don't move; but if the person keeps moving the roleplay is kind of just already messed up and they will likely...

If roleplay is already broken you can't really break it further. Voiding fear rp or doing fail rp just ruins it instantly. No real way to "Preserve roleplay" after it's broken. All it does is annoy people

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: The Rule edition adds that if roleplay is already broken (Fail Rp, Fear rp being broken, ETC) that Mixing does not apply if the member says (You have guns on you, you are under fear rp) If someone is avoiding fear rp the roleplay scenario is already...

That doesn't really sound like a good idea, what if its like /c3 [S-Site Advisor] Did you approve of a 610 stuff. It really feels like it would make info breaching really easy

I was mainly referring to the person who mains GSD CPT (Who auto spawns with a body camera) I do also agree that people will likely forget to turn it on in the first place, but I think E-11 can make a policy to enforce them being on if you spawn with them. Additionally, it's less awkward to...

if the case is "Just get it from a dispenser", then why give any CL4+ Member or GSD SGTs a body camera? Why make it rules for thee but not for me? Realistically, if we want to make these points, I believe ISD would be the only ones who spawned with one. Most NCOs will forget to get one...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: A bodycam should auto spawn with either CPL+ rank within E-11 if it's possible to spawn it based on rank, or it should auto spawn on Biohazard, Containment Unit, and Breacher, since they are mostly used by NCOs/Junior NCOs. I think it's a pretty fair...