Search results

if it is why do staff members on 17th do that then? ?

I would be neutral with this, but because straight suggested it -support

+support very good

Good to know that u revamped it, used to hear that it was annoying to get in. Idk if only having the training programme will be enough tho, as currently seen Trainees need to wait ridiculous times to be able to progress to a PVT of either NWO or NATO. This is why I think this should be...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Admin gives every trainer mastery XP (credit) or ingame money for each trainee that they train (potentially if staff is not online, the trainer can provide a clip and admin checks if the trainer has already been rewarded for training them, you'd have...

+support 1stAL/SWB needs another SC, I see Kowalski as the best person to fill that role

+support imho just remove the war types tho :P

+support

yeah, but in the suggestion I'm talking about if all territories are held by a faction after war there will be a 1 hour base raid event after an appropriate amount of time

If it is, it isn't executed ingame then NWO had every territory capped on the third day of campaign but it was just normal conquest afterwards and we couldn't even start the base raid because it was only a two lane conquest and apparently it needs to be a three lane one

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Makes Base raid event trigger (like with campaign end, the 1 hour base raid thing) if all territories are 100% capped by one faction If the base raid is successful, that will trigger a premature campaign end for the faction that won the base raid. If...

I'd say -support cuz I don't like the war types, but I think that it should only be changed if a majority of both sides agree, it should ask each side individually if they want the other war type, as to not give either side an advantage that the other couldn't oppose. Asking each side...

true, you still count for cap even if you're down aswell, didn't think about that. maybe just change that if possible

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Makes everyone that's dying (laying on the ground) invincible and put on Bleedout for 60 seconds (that they can still fast-forward with right click if they want to) Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Give all tanks except for TAM/Leo smokes like A2, Chally, T14 and the HQs currently have it Maybe it could be all tanks and Puma/K-17 but idk, let me know what u think Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: 1. Changes vehicle stats (Example): Supply Truck: 1500 Supplies, 800 Ammo Ammo Truck: 2000 Ammo, 600 Supplies 2. Make building FOB blueprints faster 3. Increase Mastery XP gain from building/supplying FOBs Has something similar been...

I think we could be hindering the server's potential by keeping it with TS3, imagine if everyone on DarkRP had to join the Teamspeak in order to play another job than citizen

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Moves comms from TeamSpeak over to Discord Adds voice channels for every reg which everyone can view but u can only join if ur in the regiment (or SC for example). It'd basically be like you can see your own reg's text channels and voice channels...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Remove war types: Search and Destroy, Capture the Flag, Kill Confirmed Replace them with the following two war types: 50% Conquest like it is currently implemented 50% Attrition with Territory Capture always ON with territory capture on like in...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Adds a rule against Staff changing Vehicle/Heli skins Exceptions to rule: 1. Game Master related stuff like events and testing stuff out 2. during downtime* 3. for trainings, but you MUST change it back, if the vehicle/heli skin isn't the default...