Search results

-Support i get it, but unfortunately, no. there's far better ways of doing this, most of which are already being discussed in other active suggestions

+Support + Active. + Have only had good interactions with this individual. + Good for the position.

+Major Support

...sure +Support

FLC changes are an IC thing, you don't make forum suggestions for these

i mean anyone can, that is its intended purpose :alien:

a hangar is where you store clothes and a hanger is where you store aeroplanes :)

further thought on this - how about we move one of these unused camera screens to CPC? this would add more reason to man it and more reason to expect it to be manned - which could encourage traffic through CPC, especially from LCZ -> PW only issue i can think of other than potentially clashing...

...yeah, okay. that or just CL1 only comms (so just /c1, no /c), which would give a use to CL1 comms i have stated in the past that "under no circumstances should an scp have comms," as it's too abusable and creates too many weird situations, but this has too little room for that happening for...

...yeah, ok. this is good. the current method of passive breaching is mostly just revolving around IC policy and such (i can't speak for US as i have no idea how it works there, but i can't imagine it's that much different, plus you could argue that passive breaching is sort of a content thing...

I mean where there were other staff of appropriate rank but weren't available at that time, I would have rather waited for them to be available, than have the ticket dismissed entirely - Either way in that situation, I'm still left waiting, which I get that some mind that, but I don't; And I...

-/+ Neutral + They were very active during their previous tenure on the staff team. + To my recollection, were always polite and amicable in every interaction I have had with them. -/+ However, I have some doubts about your ability as a member of staff - My only interactions with you in...

no, but that's no reason to start heading in the other direction for convenience's sake this is fair - they're contributing over comms and such, alright. it's still imbalanced though, as it gives them this power directly in their spawn area, but i also thought more about this and realised that...

h

while i get the idea and its uses, your specific use case example feels more like a failure on the part of staff to grasp situational context - and n that circumstance, i do also appreciate the fact that in some situations this may be caused by certain situational hazards such as... idk, sleep...

this isn't making a rule though, this is making an actual mechanical change

Why are you applying for Site Advisor? The reason I am applying for Site Advisor is mostly an on-a-whim spur-of-the-moment sorta thing, which at face value seems pretty non-committal, but I've given this a decent amount of thought - I feel like I need to expand into some new areas; I mean...

+Support ISD :mad:

I like the premise, but I think off the bat, that staff's main hangup would be this being a specific server suggestion (as this appears to be asking for a server-specific major change to content that is part of the core server focus, and the FAQ has a stipulation on this) - I do appreciate, and...