Search results

neutral haven't had any interactions with you so i can't judge fully you seem active but then again your experience is pretty low for HC standards nonetheless good luck with your app

Uh huh and thats why we should make game unbearable for tank regiments? Because we are not playing laser tag?? Last time i checked this is a garrys mod server, where its just not possible to balance things like this. Go play like arma or something if tanks give you skill issue to a degree where...

i do not see how getting at4's buffed will benefit tank regiments, at all thing is u can respawn alongside ur rockets, and tanks dont (shocker) this suggestion is just stupid because u dont want to work around current damage and just are crying for a buff . because the dmg is not as much as u...

Then how about you compare dmg that nade does to a tank and the dmg at4 does. If you wanna kill radars that bad nade them And you are forgetting that a team gets a lot of at4s . Tank regiments are already suffering enough from helis and your so called "useless at4" tank to tank combat basically...

Sure buddy we won a gazillion base raids in past 6 months !!!!!!

-support No Its literally out of my understanding why you think that having a tac on top of a hc building should be illegal Ur saying that it should be placed in a accessible spot for base defenders to remove the tac easily. Im sorry but i hope you understand that defenders can like spawn in...

ight suggestion edited

Just as notice to any platform team members this is my final response to jason if it happens so that he responds again. I think you dont get the idea of this suggestion. If for example NATO have 8 non afk people on the server SWB can do a Pathfinder assault and vice versa for JAF. Its not...

so because nwo doesnt have numbers and im asking for a bit of balance ur calling bias? sure!!!!!

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: add the rule in the title Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: no Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): gives the opposing team a chance to defend the assaulted fob disallows rule...

+support very honestly it's literally the dumbest rule change in past few months

-support mmmh yes a regiment vs an entire faction because they had to do a callout like a minute before, sounds so fair!!!!!!!! this does NOT make it fair though it is true currently it is really easy to take down an fob some other balancing method has to be used or just completely remove...

+support good man, active, has been respective of rules since he came back

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Add/increase in game bonuses for being a CO+, such as maybe higher payment, better equipment, some new addons that would benefit the CO's. (as a note I do not mean to add things like access for B2,cuffs or other things that may create chaos and...

-support offer is an offer thats why its called negotiations

+support i think that tanks explosion radius should get at least a small buff to increase its ability to do ground support considering how easy it is to kill a tank (with kwk or cas, and like 3 people with at4s can easily set it on fire) it should be able to do a bit more than killing fobs and...

+support

Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:464734532 Discord name: wryyy_ For how long have you played on MRP: since may/june 2021 Age: 19 In what country are you located?: Georgia Time zone: GMT+4 (BST+3) NATO name (regiment and rank): SAS SGT Vladislav II NWO name (regiment and rank): SWB COL Vladislav Civilian...

+Support my favorite fat man gm (one of the best gm's in the past imo)

+Support