Search results

+Support May only be a small QoL change, but it IS a QoL change nonetheless.

Looks well thought out, is realistic, and is rewarding for whichever side controls the airfield. On top of that, the protection of the places doesn't necessarily have to be RMP/AOR, but could also be SAS/STS too, as well as a joint effort by both. I personally believe that the latter is the best...

-Support Mud summed it up well. Would it be cool at first? Yes. But it would quickly devolve into one side losing, instantly surrendering, new campaign starting, and the same thing happening again due to no lessons being taken from it, and that, is not fun at all.

Oof, I did say I was gonna write a fleshed out suggestion for this... Welp, 2 week wait to perfect it I guess :'D

Neutral/-Support I do wan to give you a +support, however, as Markous said, you've had a long history of being lazy and not leading, making others do your job while going afk, which myself and others tried to get you to stop doing, to no avail, and then of course as Alexandria said, you were...

Let's gooooo +Support

+Support It's a very well thought out suggestion, and would help RP situations on the two sides. On top of that, everyone loves the idea, and hasn't disliked it(not counting WotInkermnation's dislike, as it doesn't seem to be valid as it was trying to say this suggestion is invalid because a...

Dude, why is it that when I flash somebody, it's like I just slapped them in the face with a fucking napkin from a little kid's birthday party?!

+Support

+Support As you said, giving it a fresh look would boost morale like when I got the SAS the MP5s again, and the 2nd link does still have gas masks, along with 2 camo options, so would be very nice. Only downside is no black vests that I can see from the photos, but sacrifices must be made after all.

+Support This is a very interesting idea, and if done right(like I believe the dev team would), would be an incredible addition to their tools. The only thing that worries me, however, is that it could lead to subconscious bias, as even GMs main a side, and without realizing may give more...

+Support It actually represents NHC, looks better, and feels more in place in a roleplaying server.

-Support All the above reasons. On top of that, technically this is already in the server, but reserved ONLY for when someone is kidnapped, if they're unable to be rescued.

However, this does go into RP territory, and SAS is meant to be a big RP regiment, which is what Gaz, Vitto, the rest of CC and I are trying to bring back.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion aims to remove the ARX-160 from SAS and give it to JAF. To keep it balanced, the MP5 would get the weapon stats for the slot that the ARX-160 is currently in, and the ARX-160 would get the weapon stats for the slot that the MP5 is...

As a member of SAS, I +Support this. Partially still active. Kidnapping Strikes are given out if their actions led to it (going out by themselves, not RTBing with other members of NATO, etc.), but if their actions didn't lead to it(in a big group but an NWO group twice the size comes along)...

Current: Special Air Service Sergeant Artemis Former: Special Operations Task Force Lieutenant Artemis Medals/Ribbons: Medal/Ribbon Names(from Left to Right, Top to Bottom): Recipient of the Purple Heart[PH]

I did call a sit, thank you very much, hence my saying "and nothing's done". Mods didn't do shit, because everyone's become lazy regarding headglitching. So maybe you can just simply be quiet and ignore problems that don't concern you. This was meant to be a nice civilized conversation, and...

I mean, maybe it should be posted as an example, instead of being left out despite being the more commonly used tactic by people?

When someone headglitches for an entire war, and nothing's done, because everyone's become lackadaisical about it, you know that something has to be done about it. No need to be patronizing about it, however.