Search results

Exactly, it's been allowed to go on for way too long

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion aims to have head-glitching, which already isn't allowed, on the rules page. Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): With this officially being placed on the rules page, people would be more aware of this rule, improving...

+Support

+Support but change it to 2 times per war per person. It more aligns with what Jimothy said, while still not allowing 1 person to dictate the outcome of a war.

Currently +/-Neutral, however, I would go for +Support if the following was met; > Only allowed during peacetime/pre-war, > Only does a small amount of limited damage (maybe 5 damage every 10 seconds), and > Only limited to Mastery 15 or Mastery 20

When SWRP tho

I'm guessing that you haven't actually read the suggestion, because as the suggestion points out, it's stupid right now, and quite unrealistic. The suggester also agreed with the proposal of a nerf on an already weak area, to get the buff of being able to resupply, as it should be able to like...

I just read all the above, and the -support ones are right. -Support

This

While I like the idea, this idea was already denied a few days ago

Oh ok! Thanks Harry!

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion adds a computer and printer back to the mess hall. Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): It means that SL+ will be able to print out documents by themselves, instead of having to find wherever they are on the map. Helps...

+Support Means people will have to use actual AA weapons instead of moaning about KWKs not being able to be used now, and gives infantry more of a chance, when there's no JAF/SWB on

I mean, I was hoping you'd actually offer some insight on why you think it would be bad. So if you're not going to, you might as remove the comment I replied to, otherwise it could set a precedent on just downvoting legitimate suggestions for... "no reason at all."

I mean, if it gets accepted I'm sure they'd also add it to AOR regardless of it being an RMP suggestion, for balancing reasons. But what do you mean it makes it hacking more difficult for no reason? Hacking's loud anyway, so this suggestion wouldn't really affect Hacking.

+Support Agreed with all parts.

Reading over your suggestion Vampuffin's reply on how to avoid lag, I have to say that I believe this would be a good addition if it gets accepted. +Support

Like I said to Connor, to counter that point, couldn't the model for the weapon the player holds be changed to better fit the roleplay? I'm sure that's more than within the devs capabilities. Also, shouldn't function outweigh looks, with the benefits it could bring? The information noted in my...

To counter that point, couldn't the model for the weapon the player holds be changed to better fit the roleplay? Also, shouldn't function outweigh looks, with the benefits it could bring? Cheers for reading again, -Oceanus

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion is to change the grappling hook SWEP we currently have, to one that works better. https://www.gmodstore.com/market/view/hat-s-hook Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): A possible positive is that it promotes teamwork as...