Search results

-Support On top of what’s above, it would be the MOST BORING WAR because 4v4 attrition war would be at the most in a war 80 kills and cause just straight annoyance for everyone. I think a better method is keeping lane war but reducing the duration of the war and the peacetime after the...

Thank you for your comment, It could be just a loose grip on the Reg but it’s not just MPC “Complaining” when I was in AOR and RMP it was a big issue as well that RP during peacetime is not there and RMP/AOR have nothing to offer in the middle of war If this gets denied I’ll probably make a...

To respond to all the messages without replying to all of them individually. I feel as in the current state (for the US Server) MPC doesn’t have something that makes them a use even during peacetime, most people can’t stand getting arrested and tend to just relog, call their Reg command over TS...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Add a new Police Reg. job. This would add a job that has a lot of different items that isn't regularly available to RMP/MPC/AOR. and this will help them on the battlefield and inside of the base. My suggestion for this job is a sort of "SWAT" or...

I didnt know how to hack at the time, like at all and i still passed the hacking part and the rest of the tryout my 1st try. its really not that hard, in my opinion it SHOULD be HARDER than easier

Please close this suggestion as after a few wars using both the SKS (AOR) and SCAR-H (MPC/RMP) im going to make a new suggestion instead which would leave this suggestion useless

I love goats better than Cats and Dogs

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Allows the RMP/MPC/AOR marksmen class to have any scope on their gun Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): Allows different play styles People can choose what sight THEY prefer Possible Negatives of the suggestion: “it’s a marksmen...

+Support +Some of the best interactions ive had on SCPRP +Genuine and Great dude +Active I do believe he would make a great staff member

+support

Well the issue is that no side should get a XP boost over the other, that’s not fair. We have pretty big numbers on both sides, sometimes NWO outnumbers NATO sometimes NATO outnumbers NWO. There is no need for this suggestion And for what you suggested it just makes more dev work than what’s...

MAJOR -Support No, it’s very simple giving one side of this game a XP boost and money isn’t fair and then the bonus will just cause everyone to transfer or main NWO and most NWO have NATO characters and NATO has NWO characters anyway

+Support +Playtime +Previous CL4 +Current leader of medicine? -/+ No interactions -/+ Lore is lacking

My verdict is... Neutral Leaning towards positive +Staff experience +Active +/- Unknown Rule Knowledge - App lacks in the last 2 sections

Im going to give a Positive Verdict +SUPER active +Great guy +Good rule knowledge from my experiences +/- No staff experience (wont put it as a negative due to wanting to learn) +/- Sometimes you and others "Complain" in TS and not by a small amount +/-Immature at times (wont put it as a...

+Support +Mature (IRL Military) +Active +/- No staff experience.

Well, i can make another suggestion to reduce its damage by 500, probably would help alot, I can see it being unfair, but we dont get any extra health or things like that, I think it promotes people staying with the Jugg/flamer and stops them rushing right away to clear stuff.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: It changes the rule 3.01 from 3.01 - Handheld Rocket Launchers - Matadors/AT4's/RPG's cannot be used against infantry unless you are Militia: in which case you may use RPG's on a group of 3 or more people: If you hit less than 3 people you must...

+Support +God tier Captain +DcO +Good at executing people