Search results

+Support, content team should decide what it says though.

god no. just no. regimental? maybe but in general no. OVERWHELMING -SUPPORT!!!

As an ISD main, no.

cranberry anchor for mcnd yes please +support

+Support At least add it for SCPs I swear we have made it the norm to only check SCPs that are on according to the leaderboard whilst saying something like "Check all onsite SCPs" when technically they are all meant to be onsite.

give us a bodygroup tool instead of pac, which wont impact performance

Wow, really? You made a suggestion to remove a critical CI job such as the technical expert? This job is useful for maintenance RP on the servers in CI base, a example would be when a virus was uploaded into out system and we needed a technical expert to remove it. Furthermore the technical...

There isn't much covering why Epsilon-11 and Nu-7 were specifically chosen out of all the other MTFs to stay there. Maybe the E-11 and Nu-7 are actually some super secret project omega related STF (Stationary Task Force) who are unknowingly given much more intensive and elite training and...

Too bad the github for it is empty https://github.com/civilnetworks-projects/SCP_Public_Development/issues/516

Isnt the upcoming ETS update already going to add a rework of site staff?

-Support Unless we get all other types

+Support once the IA rework is released -Support currently, looks too similar to DEA/MTF

LEAST EDGY SA PAC

-Support archangel more like stinky RPer

+Support for Influence if this aint getting accepted then it better be partially accepted

lower elastics cooldown they shouldnt be 15 min in the first place

i would let 076 leave a ~25mm diameter hole in me

I think we need to expand on the Core Departments duties and potential responsibilities whilst somewhat limiting other MTF from doing the duties of other departments. Such as only allowing MTF into D-Block if they meet specific requirements or follow orders, not because they think D-Block is...

im not paying to change my bodygroups