Denied Holsterable Keycards

[Emilia Foddg]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:​

Let trusted CL4 roles (primarily regiment COs) have one of those infinite-use inventory items (like the event weapons) that give them a CL4 keycard, for the purpose of using on non-CL3 jobs (i.e. MTF CPT wants to play on MTF, but all CL4 regiment jobs are taken, so they have to be one of the jobs available to below LT, which prevents them from doing CL4 stuff).

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:​

Past suggestion about storing keycards:

Accepted - Storage Cache's

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion would add a storage cache for Foundation, UNGOC and CI. this would be a sizable container (or several (1 per item type)) for people to store their Looted weapons & keycards in a dedotated container instead of slapping them down...

www.civilgamers.com

Intersects, but ultimately deals with a different thing.

Past suggestion about making MTF keycards scale with rank (so that when a LT or higher flags onto a job below LT, they spawn with a CL4 card)

Denied - Make MTF Keycards Scale with rank (MTF DEPENDANT)

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: [Make keycards scale with MTF Ranking (excluding A1/O1) Example: A Nu7 LT flags onto marksman and keeps his CL4 card.] Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): [Makes jobs more efficient for Cl4's if the Cl4 job is full. Allows Cl4 to...

civilgamers.com

(Note that it was denied because it's a planned feature)
This suggestion is a way of facilitating this, as there appears to be enough issues actually accomplishing this that keep it far from being done (which makes sense, it's VWar, only two people can work on it) - So this is intended as a temporary patch over, to resolve this in the meantime.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):​

• Method of accomplishing the thing that is already planned and thus comes with all the positive effects of doing that thing.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:​

• Abusable, Major Issues - The thing with this is that people would be able to misuse it by being able to give themselves a CL4 card on jobs they generally shouldn't have it on, Tech Expert for example. And on top of that, it is apparently very difficult to remove something from someone's inventory that they should not have, so... Uhhhhh yeah.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:​

It's high noon.

Both Cowboy A and Cowboy B pull their keycards from their holster out at the same time.

Cowboy A has a CL4 card, Cowboy B has a CL3 card. Cowboy B dies instantly.

Cowboy A is subsequently tribunalled for Murder 2 and Unionising 1.

 

[KaptianCore]

No. This is a bad idea and also would mess up how vkeycards work all together.

 

[Emilia Foddg]

No. This is a bad idea and also would mess up how vkeycards work all together.

?
Are you referring to being able to do /holster with a keycard out, because that is not what is being suggested at all.

 

[grunger]

Don't know if you could trust every CL4 position holder not to abuse this.

 

[KaptianCore]

?
Are you referring to being able to do /holster with a keycard out, because that is not what is being suggested at all.

Having the keycard in the inventory all together. I don't think we can have an inventory item that can't be traded. This is a bad idea and can be done in a less abusable way via the suggestion that is accepted and on the tracker.

 

[Dr Random K.]

-support gotta be real, this sounds horrible

 

[Gizzmo]

-support

 

[Geronimo]

- support
no. if you want to be a CL4 on another class that isnt CL4, then thats the sacrifice you give, pretty sure its planned in future to rework it to allow you to do so

 

[Boris Johnson]

-Support

 

[elad]

You usually cook but in this case you burnt it.

-

 

[Emilia Foddg]

You usually cook but in this case you burnt it.

i don't aim to either cook or not cook, i simply see issues and attempt to address them that's how all my suggestions have been. a suggestion shouldn't be made with the aim of being good, it should be made with the aim of accomplishing something.

 

[Niox]

You usually cook but in this case you burnt it.

-

nuh uh
+

 

[Mr_poptart]

Suggestion Denied​

---

Hi <Emilia Foddg>,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.
The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons.

<We see this as to easily abusable by for certain regiments and teams>

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​