Partially Accepted Tactical Tablets: Chaos Insurgency, Foundation Nu-7 "Hammer Down".

Content that has been partially accepted
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jul 3, 2022
63
5
111
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
!!Disclaimer!!
This is in no way intended to take away from the GOC "experience". The only 2 reasons why they are not being included in a suggestion like this is because quite frankly I believe they need to be reworked anyway. The second reason is that this suggestion is aimed at increasing interest in surface-related occurrences, and GOC already have the tablet obviously. For the GOC players intent on gatekeeping, the more people interested in playing surface jobs, the more gameplay and RP has open to them.


Now, onto adding the tablets to CI and Foundation. The tablet itself is already known to most of the playerbase, so I will just list some asset suggestions, and you guys can decide for yourself if they are a good start, or if some, etc.

Chaos Insurgency

Man on the inside:
A Chaos Insurgent embedded in foundation as a maintenance staff opens the shipping and receiving doors to let a group of CI inside. CI operatives then enter foundation via the maintenance tunnel section. -- The way this works on the tablet could go in 2 methods:
First method would be the person using the tablet would receive a prompt on how many CI he would like to infiltrate this way, with an asset cost per body. The user would then select which players in the CI regiment will infiltrate, himself included if he chooses to.
Second method would also receive the prompt on how many CI will infiltrate. However, this will instead initiate a prompt similar to ERT with a timer, allowing the CI players to just use their cursor and slot in themselves. This could have a little animation similar to ERT arriving where the big doors are opened by someone and a van reverses in to let CI out inside.

Artillery Strike:
A volley of High Explosive is fired from a CI fire support unit at a target location. -- Self Explanatory. Number of shells up to development team.

Explosives Drop:
An assortment of explosive devices is airdropped by a smuggler flying a Cessna at a target location.
-- These can range from Tear gas, Stickies, Slams, etc. The types should be % chance. Number of uses up to dev team.

These suggested for CI are aimed primarily at using assets to facilitate infiltrating foundation first, surface combat second.


Nu-7 "Hammer Down


Airstrike - White Phosphorous:
An F-15E Strike Eagle drops an incendiary phosphorous payload at a target location. -- Number of incendiary smokes and range up to dev team, but it should be a large coverage. May incur casus belli from GOC if used in Pinewood ;)

Airstrike - Rocket strafe.
2 A-10 Warthogs strafe a target location with Hydra 70mm rockets. -- Straightforward explanation.

Weapons Delivery:
An UH-60 Blackhawk drops a crate with an assortment of heavy weapons at a target location. -- These can be weapons such as, but not limited to: Raijin, Mk8, Auger minigun, Volk. Weapons should be % chance and number of uses up to dev team.

These suggested for Nu-7 are aimed at using assets for combat with SCPs first, surface combat second.


Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Maybe, dunno.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Drums up more interest in surface-related roles.
- Increases Importance of surface objectives.
- Increases the combat dynamic in surface for each faction when fighting SCPs or each other.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Possible balance shift
- Long Dev work.


Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:

I am sure that the changes would be welcomed by both CI and Nu-7. Increasing the activity on surface by raising interest for both. GOC mains may be unhappy. But ultimately, with a very active Nu-7 and CI means GOC will have plenty more opportunities interacting with both. This could also open the way to GOC receiving a rework to their gameplay loop.


I am at least looking to get this partially accepted on the premise that some of the suggested assets are unique enough to each faction and balanced enough to implement without much problems.
 
Chaos Insurgency

Man on the inside:
A Chaos Insurgent embedded in foundation as a maintenance staff opens the shipping and receiving doors to let a group of CI inside. CI operatives then enter foundation via the maintenance tunnel section. -- The way this works on the tablet could go in 2 methods:
First method would be the person using the tablet would receive a prompt on how many CI he would like to infiltrate this way, with an asset cost per body. The user would then select which players in the CI regiment will infiltrate, himself included if he chooses to.
Second method would also receive the prompt on how many CI will infiltrate. However, this will instead initiate a prompt similar to ERT with a timer, allowing the CI players to just use their cursor and slot in themselves. This could have a little animation similar to ERT arriving where the big doors are opened by someone and a van reverses in to let CI out inside.
this is something dc's should be already be able to do but cant sadly, good idea though!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aura_
 
  • Like
Reactions: Niox
Jan 16, 2022
64
15
111
This is the warfunds addition that is fabled and somewhere in the Github (altough it might have been deleted so good thing this) , so that section is already in the works (*should be*).
But these ARE good suggestions ON TOP OF/REPLACING what options are meant to selected.
(But DEA getting something cheeky would be fun too)
+ Support
 
Jul 3, 2022
63
5
111
SC and SA with tablet 🫣
 

kenraali

Well-known Member
Jan 20, 2025
60
7
41
I think if we would get tactical tablets of foundation, it would go To SA / SC.
I Will say a +/- Support leaning +Support
 
Jul 3, 2022
63
5
111
I don't think that F or CI should get the same style of Combative Air Support that GOC has, It should be limited to Non-Combatant Focussed Support Items rather than that.
Even though both would have greater use for it than GOC currently does? The suggested ones are to use assets for their primary gameplay loops, such as Nu7 fighting SCPs on surface, or CI raiding/ Deep Covers.

What is Non-combatant focused support items for you? a field kit?
It doesn't make sense to draw the comparison to GOC's current air support assets but essentially boil it down to gatekeeping as to why CI or F shouldn't have them.
 

Holland

Head Moderator
Head Moderator
SCP-RP Staff
Content Team
Donator
Aug 27, 2022
398
83
111
Suggestion Partially Approved



Hi @Aura_ ,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.
The Content Team has chosen to partially accept your suggestion for the following reasons.

Like stated by naffen similiar suggestion have already been accepted and there is a open ticket.

We will take your suggestions and ideas into consideration when discussing this topic. 👀

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as partially accepted.​
 
  • Love
Reactions: Emilia Foddg
Status
Not open for further replies.