[UK] O5-1 "The Chimera"

was not expecting this, almost completely forgor you could apply with your like 2 hour O5-4 experience
It still counts tho!

+Support leaning towards +/-Neutral
-Most people have already said, but very clearly you have an actual passion for RP in the server, you're a friendly and cool person to interact with, the application looks the nice, and god fucking damn you have a portfolio that comes along with it. You sure are dedicated to this shiz

For me there's only 2 things holding this application back. One of them is your experience on the O5/A1 side of things. During your time as OSA I personally didn't notice anything too notable from your OSA character, and for your time as O5, it was very short lasted due to you leaving the community. For O5 applications this would be more than fine, especially with what else you've held, but this is O5-1, so I would've like to of seen some more experience on their side of things. I'm unsure of how differently Ethics acted from O5, but I still think the experience matters.

My second reason is based on something Merrick said:
When you returned a while ago we had a long yap session and it was brought up you didn't want to go for site command again.

When you then mentioned to me you were going to look into this application i brought this back up to you and you gave a pretty valid reason why you decided to alter that original vision.

And this reminded me of something, that being Broda's -1 application.
"Initially I've been against it but due to the current quality of the O5 Council, I feel its more necessary than ever to build it back up to a good quality. The structure of the server at the moment needs a competently strong O5 Council."
(Not copying out the whole thing, but I assume you would know that Broda applied for -1 in an old app while being against it, this is just a quote from it to show that he was against it).

For you this is less so, as you haven't been -1 before, or a O5 for very long, so burnout wouldn't apply, but you originally not wanting to go for -1, then changing your mind upon the position being opened reminded me a bit of this, and I would rather someone passionate about the position hold it, rather than one who is holding it just because someone competent has to.
Could be completely wrong, and you're applying because you changed your mind, but eh idk man I'm just getting deja vu.

Either way you'd prob be a good -1, you're not a huge dumbass and you like RP!
might take some time to adjust but eh who cares you have sauce
and the whole reason i made it leaning towards +/-Neutral is because you made Medical the shortest when describing how to improve RP across DPT's : (
you also didn't mention CI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

anywho gl stay cool
 
Feb 24, 2023
194
122
21
was not expecting this, almost completely forgor you could apply with your like 2 hour O5-4 experience
It still counts tho!

+Support leaning towards +/-Neutral
-Most people have already said, but very clearly you have an actual passion for RP in the server, you're a friendly and cool person to interact with, the application looks the nice, and god fucking damn you have a portfolio that comes along with it. You sure are dedicated to this shiz

For me there's only 2 things holding this application back. One of them is your experience on the O5/A1 side of things. During your time as OSA I personally didn't notice anything too notable from your OSA character, and for your time as O5, it was very short lasted due to you leaving the community. For O5 applications this would be more than fine, especially with what else you've held, but this is O5-1, so I would've like to of seen some more experience on their side of things. I'm unsure of how differently Ethics acted from O5, but I still think the experience matters.

My second reason is based on something Merrick said:


And this reminded me of something, that being Broda's -1 application.

(Not copying out the whole thing, but I assume you would know that Broda applied for -1 in an old app while being against it, this is just a quote from it to show that he was against it).

For you this is less so, as you haven't been -1 before, or a O5 for very long, so burnout wouldn't apply, but you originally not wanting to go for -1, then changing your mind upon the position being opened reminded me a bit of this, and I would rather someone passionate about the position hold it, rather than one who is holding it just because someone competent has to.
Could be completely wrong, and you're applying because you changed your mind, but eh idk man I'm just getting deja vu.

Either way you'd prob be a good -1, you're not a huge dumbass and you like RP!
might take some time to adjust but eh who cares you have sauce
and the whole reason i made it leaning towards +/-Neutral is because you made Medical the shortest when describing how to improve RP across DPT's : (
you also didn't mention CI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

anywho gl stay cool

So as you've mentioned the pieces of Merricks response (the other response I want to reply to, along with Grong/Brodas), most of what has been said has repeated here and for sake of sanity and mind and not congesting the thread, I will try do a few points here.

Essentially, my position of not wishing to return to Site Command isn't as simple as a return, or the feel for "I will be the change", going in with that mindset will cause an entire burnout and cause this to turn to a job.

I'll publicly state the reason. Before I was under the understanding that the harassment was due to my elevated position and being in the eye, and thats true. It was. But it was also due to individuals who are no longer welcome within CN that took direct issue with me due to my gender. I believe we're in a very different state now, and I want the role due to my passion for RP and the fact I can see everyone in their positions of O5 and SA, Directors, are perfect for the role but in need of a level of guidance and the want to end a cycle.

As for the experience. I would've loved to have been an O5 for longer, as O5 opens up the potential of limitless RP far more than having to be sneaky and question every choice you make within the committee. I definitely agree that while this does pull me back slightly, I view it that if I did not have Snr. CL5 experience of being a chairman prior, this would be entirely inappropriate.

As for medical, I'll adjust this shortly. I can definitely think of more, but at the end of the day medical roleplay for me is a struggle, and such advice I would seek out from the current DoM Kayla, current O5s who have high interactions and improve this tenfold from a positional perspective.

I like what I am seeing however where is your part for creation of roleplay between SCP and Groups of Interest? Chaos and GOC alike; a new Chief Overseer assignement would mean that we also get opportunities for roleplay with you and your respective groups alike (MTF Alpha-1, Assistants and FCOM as a whole?).
+ / : Neutral
I definitely agree I can add about GOC and Chaos, and my potential for joining RP with yourselves is absolutely limitless and it will be a focus, but to reiterate my perspective about medical above, I would need to consult better informed people. No-one is going to be able to go to this position without a solid set of advice and discussions, and I would love to encourage GOI RP, but I would hate to go back to "there is embassy." This would be something, within the role, I would develop with those of better experience, for example Dennid- the current -4- who was a prior DEA Director is far more informed than myself about GOI's and how to create an experience for yourselves as well!

I hope this clears up all the concerns listed prior.

And to all, thank you for your support overall so far, it is massively appreciated!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Niox
So as you've mentioned the pieces of Merricks response (the other response I want to reply to, along with Grong/Brodas), most of what has been said has repeated here and for sake of sanity and mind and not congesting the thread, I will try do a few points here.

Essentially, my position of not wishing to return to Site Command isn't as simple as a return, or the feel for "I will be the change", going in with that mindset will cause an entire burnout and cause this to turn to a job.

I'll publicly state the reason. Before I was under the understanding that the harassment was due to my elevated position and being in the eye, and thats true. It was. But it was also due to individuals who are no longer welcome within CN that took direct issue with me due to my gender. I believe we're in a very different state now, and I want the role due to my passion for RP and the fact I can see everyone in their positions of O5 and SA, Directors, are perfect for the role but in need of a level of guidance and the want to end a cycle.

As for the experience. I would've loved to have been an O5 for longer, as O5 opens up the potential of limitless RP far more than having to be sneaky and question every choice you make within the committee. I definitely agree that while this does pull me back slightly, I view it that if I did not have Snr. CL5 experience of being a chairman prior, this would be entirely inappropriate.

As for medical, I'll adjust this shortly. I can definitely think of more, but at the end of the day medical roleplay for me is a struggle, and such advice I would seek out from the current DoM Kayla, current O5s who have high interactions and improve this tenfold from a positional perspective.


I definitely agree I can add about GOC and Chaos, and my potential for joining RP with yourselves is absolutely limitless and it will be a focus, but to reiterate my perspective about medical above, I would need to consult better informed people. No-one is going to be able to go to this position without a solid set of advice and discussions, and I would love to encourage GOI RP, but I would hate to go back to "there is embassy." This would be something, within the role, I would develop with those of better experience, for example Dennid- the current -4- who was a prior DEA Director is far more informed than myself about GOI's and how to create an experience for yourselves as well!

I hope this clears up all the concerns listed prior.

And to all, thank you for your support overall so far, it is massively appreciated!
I am waiting, Counselor.
Change to +Support