Fun fact: You can't. A lot of the actual arrest reasons help encourage professionalism on base. I don't think sexual assault as an arrest reason has ever been used seriously in MRP.
if you are getting arrested on an mrp server for sexual assault you have something wrong in the head and need a lot more help than being arrested in gmod.
-support would promote shit roleplay and be used to mess about
Neutral
If you make a bid you have to pay anyways, you can't really scam ER/PC by refusing to pay. Elsewhere it's kind of the responsibility for the ER/PC to make sure they give themselves sufficient time to go and collect the money before the start of war.
Thing is you aren't able to do it on old style ones as far as I've seen, given I've tried to do it before but unable to because most of the time an SL member sets it to the base raid mode instead which makes it impossible to do to my understanding.
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Make it so you can still capture the surrounding territories of a base during base raids. Basically will revert it back to the old system of if you neutralise a territory during a base raid it must be called off. If people don't want this for the end...
Neutral
Your maturity isn't really shining here. According to Mc Flurry you were previously removed MRP staff? You haven't rejected that fact and if this is true, you then appearing to be a staff member on DarkRP indicates to me at least an act of being power-hungry.
The application is also...
+Support
I have no doubt about your competency and your attitude and experience definitely being what NATO needs right now to help it out.
However, there is the issue of obviously your outbursts which caused issues in the past but I haven't seen much of that for a while, so my main concern is...
=Neutral
It might be okay IF it's returned to 1 slot per each regiment. Prior to the update there were 2 ISAF/IVG sniper slots, 1 SAS/STS and 2 HC ones. 5 snipers on the server was way too much, 3 might be alright. Thing is though it also can depend on the map for how annoying they are and...
I don't get what is being asked here. Are you saying that staff shouldn't use the commands to remove and restock their vehicles and bring the same vehicle back out to full health? If so then that's logically staff abuse in the first place. But if you just deploy your second tank you had of that...
Do you not read changelogs? They have attempted to bring lag down with a ton of different patches & fixes and as Renolk said Gmod is quite old, there is only so much that can be done.
- Support
Don't mind aiming down scope, I think it does help slow people down a bit in combat although there could be other changes to accompany it not sure exactly what.
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Makes a multitude of changes to guns in MRP, to stop the arguments over issues with guns. Open a dialogue on it I'll list how, and make it more tactical.;
Generally, this idea could be enacted in a few ways:
1: Be more open about guns to the...
I'll just respond to clarify. We had Ruins fully capped but after this you took 2-3 minutes to move on Hotel, and I believe there were some SAS off point that should have realistically been controlled.
-Support
+ Active
+ Friendly
- No wars led
- Lacking in leadership abilities within SAS
In the first war on Syria yesterday, I believe it was you and another SAS present. Both of you were disorganised, struggled to actually get on point and were generally running off to other points and...
= Neutral (leaning -Support)
+Active
+Friendly
=Ok app(you state there's better candidates for HC which isn't a good statement to make)
=Ok warleading (You lack initiative or willingness to lead which HC need)
-Really not confident on your maturity due to what I've seen
I've justified it, but...
-Support
To my knowledge you are active and are one of the only CC in JAF, so important to the regiment.
However, you have stated your weaknesses as 'stubborn' and lacking war leading experience. To begin with, I do not think NHC needs another inexperienced war leader. This is nothing against...
-Support (mostly)
Ok I do see your points, the SCOM paying thing is annoying and needs fixing. However, giving the job an AT4/Stinger can make it more difficult for those regiments as you've pointed out.
As well as this, in making this suggestion my assumption is that your jobs relating to...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.