[UK] Emilia Foddg OSA App #2

Steam ID:​

STEAM_0:1:33007778

Discord name:​

nopetoofast

For how long have you played on CG SCP:​

3 years

Here's my monthly VTime taken as of 13:08 on the 10th of June, 2026:
gmod_0gHDE4lJvl.png

Age:​

28

In what country are you located?:​

UK

Time zone:​

BST/GMT

Character name(s):​

F - Emilia Foddg
CI - Milyuh Ferdge

Civilian name:​

Oh-ho 'Eightzo' M'bee-Varris

What server are you applying for? (SCP-RP UK or SCP-RP USA):​

UK

Do you have a mic?:​

Explode for asking (No)

List all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held:​

Holding:
  • CI Gamma x2

  • SCP-096 (Both Servers)

  • SCP-22415

  • ISD/DEA WL, Medical License (Both Servers), Riot License
Held:
  • Suggestions Subforum Ban

  • Site Advisor Application Ban

  • MTF E-11 CPT

  • Overseer Assistant

  • GOC SGT

  • MTF Nu7 CPL

Have you received any kicks/bans/warning? and why?:​

gmod_hFD57kOqkg.png
  • 25th of May, 2026 - FailRP for putting a fake 096 pic on lecture hall projector

  • 20th of May, 2026 - Hopped into D-Block as a Chef to play chess with the D-Class, Staff were not amused = FailRP

  • 19th of November, 2025 - Engaged in unauthorised TreasonRP = FailRP

  • 11th of June, 2025 - Broke FearRP by panic-using 106 when held under gunpoint

  • 14th of February, 2024 - Manual AFK Kick

  • 23rd of September, 2023 - FailRP for leaving fake 096 pics in FL3 elevator

  • 13th July, 2023 - FailRP for hacking out SCPs as a Sr. Researcher

What makes you the best candidate for Overseer Assistant?:​

I wasn't the last time I applied, and I'm not this time. Only difference now being that I have past experience as an OSA and as a former E-11 CPT.

Despite my best efforts, I presently hold no other roles that require significant time investment, which apparently was a requirement to obtain said roles in the first place. "Entry level position, requires 10 years of experience" ahhh roles. I resigned before due to overwhelming mounting pressure from overloading my prior responsibilities between this, E-11 CPT and Game Master roles, but now I'm ready to return to the role. Will you take me back?

What are the responsibilities of Overseer Assistants in RP?:​

Assistant hold a great deal of authority onsite. When executing the direct orders of the O5 council, they have near-absolute authority with which to do so, for the express purpose. Even when not executing O5 orders, they still hold a great deal of power, being above every other junior CL4 position onsite. There's still significant and somewhat messy intersections with regards to standing Site Jurisdiction policy, but the more general things are usually pretty clear and sensible, while unique edge cases are generally dealt with on a case-by-case basis.

An assistant's onsite authority, aside from executing O5 orders, is generally to be used for ensuring departments/regiments are operating in line with Foundation interests & values (observing, investigating and sometimes even interrogating Foundation personnel to ensure their loyalty to the O5 Council remains intact), as well as to generally aid in the Site's continued healthy operation and existence (Potentially assisting in handling Site Codes, maybe authing AA if necessary, being generally involved in Site bureaucracy).

It's not really a forefront duty of an Assistant (unless by the will of an O5), but if needs be, there are situations where an Assistant can give orders to an MTF from outside their internal ranking structure. In relation to E-11, this could be to do with an SCP test, or potentially a passive breach if necessary (Although that's usually the duty of Site Admin). In relation to Nu7, this could generally be to do with GOIs or otherwise some form of obscure surface operation, which may also likely involve DEA - It's really more down to the specific circumstance. AO is kinda funky - There's the obvious case that when you have a security escort, there are some general contextual orders you can give, within the given situation; Especially in situations where you're executing an order involving a specific person of interest, for example, an O5 orders you to forcefully bring the DoEA to FL3, you'd take a couple of A1 with you - I mean in that example, the O5 would probably order A1 to do that directly, but you get my point. Otherwise generally, the way I understand it, you generally don't step on A1's toes and leave things more up to A1 COs.

On a somewhat related note, Assistants are Foundation Staff's general first point of contact with the O5 Council (usually referred to as Site Inspectorate outside of CL4+ discussions) - And in a sort of 'vice versa' manner, Assistants are the primary instruments through which the O5 council exert their authority over the Site. So the communication goes both ways.

I know it's planned to allow FCOM roles to sign stuff with a different signature, but since it's a planned thing and this is still an Assistant's duty at the time of writing, when any form of written authorisation is needed from an Overseer, Assistants are expected to do so on their behalf, so as to retain INFOSEC/OPSEC.

Generally speaking, Assistants should know the rules that govern the Site overall. While they don't directly enforce these in the same way an ISD agent would on the ground (unless directly related to their work or an order), there are situations where Assistants may need to order an arrest, or be needed to facilitate an arrest - And hold someone to account where necessary.

As a front for Overseers & one of A-1's VIPs, need to be a proper representative of them, and not do anything that could potentially reflect poorly on their reputation. Otherwise, Assistants are generally just the O5 Council's busybodies, expected to perform tasks on Floor 3 and around the Site - As members of Jr. CL4 personnel, they are expected to follow the typical duties of Jr. CL4, which may be to provide access where needed in the form of operating blast doors (or more usually, restrict where needed by expressly not providing said access, it's situation-dependant), general Code protocol, sometimes even cycle FSL, sometimes emergency command centre stuff, etc. But the chief, most important duty of any Jr. CL4, is to create RP around the Site - Some examples of this are potentially engaging with RSD tests, with Medical, or just very specific, bespoke activities with other Site Departments.

Why do you wish to become an Overseer Assistant?:​

...Well this section's new. Weird that you wouldn't just fold this into the best candidate section for brevity, but whatever - I've been wanting to get back into the thick of it for a while - Been trying for Site Advisor for the past 2 years, no dice. Tried out Nu7, didn't like the direction it was going with high requirements to keep the role, left. Spent time off and on trying to get into A1, no dice. Even tried going for Exec, no dice. There's some desire to rejoin E-11, but I don't quite have the necessary tolerance for the regiment's current demands.

Bereft of direction, I now return to OSA with my tail between my legs, begging to rejoin the fun Assistant environment I used to thrive in before. I loved creating RP with FCOM and AO, and I aspire to do so once more. I'd like to come home.

Please give some lore about your Overseer Assistant character and what storylines they would be involved in:​

Lore Doc


EDIT 12/06: Looked into the signature thing and updated that part of the app accordingly.
 
Last edited:
Even tried going for Exec, no dice.
You have a constant and reoccuring habit of applying for positions with either zero experience in their relevant departments, no activity, or a joke application. I would know, I handled your Executive application. You hadn't played a second on Researcher when you applied, while also applying for GSD captain (on the US server) at the same time.

You've also gotten two recent warnings for FailRP.

If you're (ever) serious about applying for any position I recommend actually playing the server and taking it at least semi-seriously.
 
  • Cool
Reactions: Emilia Foddg
Alright, it's been a little while, so I'll just nip this in the bud now:
You have a constant and reoccuring habit of applying for positions with either zero experience in their relevant departments, no activity
Your standards for these metrics are far too high if you think if I have "zero experience" in RSD and "no activity," holy :freeze:
or a joke application.
First, that was one time, Secondly, why should that reflect?
I would know, I handled your Executive application.
Given the first part, I can only see this as a massive self-report. Seeing your attitude both regarding my application and me in general, I honestly don't think it's a coincidence how or why you were removed from DoR shortly following my Exec app and the fact that you continue to display this behaviour is telling.
You hadn't played a second on Researcher when you applied
This is patently false.
You've also gotten two recent warnings for FailRP.
Yes. As I have said repeatedly in the past, I absolutely don't mind tanking FailRP warnings if it means everyone had fun. I also think that those two recent ones in particular are overzealous - Like, I can go over the specifics, but the bottom line is, those two warnings IMO were wholly unnecessary and basically just taking away RP from ISD. I would contest them via complaints, but I feel like attempting to overturn them is a waste of everyone involved's time. IMO, FailRP is a little too overzealously policed these days - Like if it's something minor and something that could easily be considered an ISD case, just let the events play out.

Anyway, "recent" in this case being the 20th and 25th of May. It's almost mid-June. If the warns were active, sure I'd see your point, but anyone even slightly looking into this would see only a blatant attempt at character assassination.
If you're (ever) serious about applying for any position I recommend actually playing the server and taking it at least semi-seriously.
Given that I directly and explicitly told you in no uncertain terms before when you asked in my Exec application about whether or not it was serious, and the fact that you still don't seem to believe that after the fact, if you're ever serious about engaging in a discussion or responding to any application, then I recommend this wonderful little thing called 'reading comprehension' and at taking that at least semi-seriously.

If you want to try and make a point about something potentially reflecting poorly on me, maybe don't write these very obvious hit pieces which can be taken apart with even the slightest dissection?

I'm actually so mad at this that I'm going to report it a second time, good god. Firmly downthumbered. (n)
 
Lets keep it a buck. That event suggestion was something else, however, it will have to agree with everyone else. Please for the love of God get serious, lock in for a couple of weeks and maybe I'll +support it.

Otherwise

-SUPPORT

 
  • Cool
Reactions: Emilia Foddg
Please for the love of God get serious, lock in for a couple of weeks
Done. Just because you personally don't see it, doesn't mean it isn't there. Literally have a whole section about how I have been attempting to get back into it for the past year and a bit.
 
Last edited:
Done. Just because you personally don't see it, doesn't mean it isn't there. Literally have a whole section about how I have been attempting to get back into it for the past year and a bit.
The only things I see from you is bad GM tickets and suggestions. I don’t know what you actually do on UK server but you are quite unserious from what I see.
 
The only things I see from you is bad GM tickets and suggestions. I don’t know what you actually do on UK server but you are quite unserious from what I see.
Everyone sees what they want to, it seems
You quite literally state in your first sentence that you are not a good candidate for the role. This should be an instant denial.
I know I told Redmont to actually read the things people tell them - This is taking that in a 'literally taking everything at face value' direction. It should be fairly obvious to anyone that my angle here is honesty and avoiding over self-aggrandising. And the previous time I held OSA, that app started out the same way, so clearly the people handling that app were able to recognise that not everyone needs to be all 'I'm the best' when it comes to a role, and shunning other approaches enforces that kind of toxic and potentially incredibly damaging positivity.
If you are to apply for a role, do try to actually get it
Yep, doing that. Been doing that. As I keep telling you.

What is happening, is there something in the water? Something is way off here, and I don't quite understand what it is. Why am I basically drawing aggro on what should be a fairly straightforward app? Like... You can't tell someone their own intentions, especially when they are expressly telling you otherwise. That's not a contribution, that's just bullying.
 
Last edited:
-Support

The application is one thing but the rare times i see you on foundation you do not roleplay seriously at all, constantly bordering mingery, this is shown when you were playing researcher and decided to put SCP-096s face all over your sampling documents. The recent warnings are also a concerning aspect as well and your immature responses to the comments on your application speaks volumes on your attitude.